Hello Ondrej,
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 7:51 AM Ondrej Zajicek
wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:12:53AM -0700, Terra Nova wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:21 AM Alexander Zubkov
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I suppose it could happen because "for" is looking
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:12:53AM -0700, Terra Nova wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:21 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suppose it could happen because "for" is looking for an active route
> > for the given destination. And filtered routes would not be
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:21 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suppose it could happen because "for" is looking for an active route
> for the given destination. And filtered routes would not be matched.
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 3:57 AM Terra Nova wrote:
> >
> >
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 02:19:27PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:49:06PM +0300, Alexander Shikov wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > All of our BGP peers have 'prefer older' option enabled.
> > But I noticed that best route is not the oldest one:
>
> Hi
>
> The option 'prefer
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:49:06PM +0300, Alexander Shikov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> All of our BGP peers have 'prefer older' option enabled.
> But I noticed that best route is not the oldest one:
Hi
The option 'prefer older' is a bit misnomer, it does not mean the one
with the oldest timestamp, but
Hi Alexander,
Suggest you confirm with the BGP route selection algorithm bgp_rte_better,
the option "prefer older" will work only when all pervious selection options
are the same.
Best Regards,
Arvin Gan
-Original Message-
From: Bird-users On Behalf Of Alexander Shikov
Sent:
Hello!
All of our BGP peers have 'prefer older' option enabled.
But I noticed that best route is not the oldest one:
bird> show route for 91.226.190.1 all
91.226.190.0/24via 193.25.181.44 on bge0 [ITSTARCOM 2019-05-10 11:05:56] *
(100) [AS50981i]
Type: BGP unicast univ
Bryce Wilson wrote on 12/05/2019 16:31:
I would love to see some Bird2 packages for Ubuntu as I use Ubuntu
Server for many of my routers. I could easily pin it to the Debian
repositories for now though.
In this situation, you can roll you own very easily with something like:
apt install -y
Hi Marco,
On 13.05.19 08:12, Kees Meijs wrote:
> I'm not sure how the process works exactly in terms of backports, but
> maybe it makes sense to provide the bird2 package via stretch-backports
> as well? That is, if Buster is considered stable.
The typical Ubuntu Package Cycle works in a way
On 13/05/2019 08:12, Kees Meijs wrote:
> Thank you for pointing that out and will do in a few weeks when Buster's
> stable.
From my standpoint, the main problem with the current state of things is that
the "normal" upgrade path from 1.6 to 2.0 does not work. Neither can one install
both versions
Hi Marco,
Thank you for pointing that out and will do in a few weeks when Buster's
stable.
(Only checked in current stable and backports; didn't look in NEW.)
I'm not sure how the process works exactly in terms of backports, but
maybe it makes sense to provide the bird2 package via
11 matches
Mail list logo
