On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:33:32PM +0200, Maximilian Eschenbacher wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> the following patch creates a testcase on top of the master branch for
> bsprintf with %lR which fails on both my raspberrys (Raspbian Buster,
> armv6l and armv7l, gcc version 8.3.0). I noticed it by looki
Hey everyone,
the following patch creates a testcase on top of the master branch for
bsprintf with %lR which fails on both my raspberrys (Raspbian Buster,
armv6l and armv7l, gcc version 8.3.0). I noticed it by looking at
$ birdc6 show babel entries
which prints all router ids as 00:00:00:00:00:
I have also prepared some changes to the documentation. But it
probably should wait unitl the questions with VRF and non VRF are
finalized. For example in the current state, that catch-all behaviour
better to be described too.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:03 PM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Ju
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 03:08:45PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:47 PM Ondrej Zajicek
> > wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > This would work, it is necessary to also set sk->vrf for bfd_open_tx_sk()
> > > foir m
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 03:08:45PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:47 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > This would work, it is necessary to also set sk->vrf for bfd_open_tx_sk()
> > foir multihop BFD. It is not necessary to handle it in bfd_reconfigure(),
> > as
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:47 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I made small fix for myself, that allow bfd to work in one VRF,
> > defined in the configuration:
> >
> > --- a/proto/bfd/packets.c
> > +++ b/proto/bfd/pac
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made small fix for myself, that allow bfd to work in one VRF,
> defined in the configuration:
>
> --- a/proto/bfd/packets.c
> +++ b/proto/bfd/packets.c
> @@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ bfd_open_rx_sk(struct bfd_proto *p, int mu
Hello,
I made small fix for myself, that allow bfd to work in one VRF,
defined in the configuration:
--- a/proto/bfd/packets.c
+++ b/proto/bfd/packets.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ bfd_open_rx_sk(struct bfd_proto *p, int multihop, int af)
sk->type = SK_UDP;
sk->subtype = af;
sk->sport = !multiho
Hi Filip
can I get a documentation or procedure of upgrade to 2.0.4 ??
Regards,
Janvier R.
On 09/07/2019, 23:39, "Ondrej Filip" wrote:
On 09. 07. 19 15:41, Rwakagabo Janvier wrote:
> Dear All,
Hello!
I strongly suggest to upgrade to one of the latest versions. Either
