On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:33:32PM +0200, Maximilian Eschenbacher wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> the following patch creates a testcase on top of the master branch for
> bsprintf with %lR which fails on both my raspberrys (Raspbian Buster,
> armv6l and armv7l, gcc version 8.3.0). I noticed it by
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 03:08:45PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:47 PM Ondrej Zajicek
> > wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > This would work, it is necessary to also set sk->vrf for bfd_open_tx_sk()
> > > foir
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 03:08:45PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:47 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > This would work, it is necessary to also set sk->vrf for bfd_open_tx_sk()
> > foir multihop BFD. It is not necessary to handle it in bfd_reconfigure(),
> >
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:47 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I made small fix for myself, that allow bfd to work in one VRF,
> > defined in the configuration:
> >
> > --- a/proto/bfd/packets.c
> > +++
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made small fix for myself, that allow bfd to work in one VRF,
> defined in the configuration:
>
> --- a/proto/bfd/packets.c
> +++ b/proto/bfd/packets.c
> @@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ bfd_open_rx_sk(struct bfd_proto *p, int
Hello,
I made small fix for myself, that allow bfd to work in one VRF,
defined in the configuration:
--- a/proto/bfd/packets.c
+++ b/proto/bfd/packets.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ bfd_open_rx_sk(struct bfd_proto *p, int multihop, int af)
sk->type = SK_UDP;
sk->subtype = af;
sk->sport =
Hi Filip
can I get a documentation or procedure of upgrade to 2.0.4 ??
Regards,
Janvier R.
On 09/07/2019, 23:39, "Ondrej Filip" wrote:
On 09. 07. 19 15:41, Rwakagabo Janvier wrote:
> Dear All,
Hello!
I strongly suggest to upgrade to one of the latest versions. Either
