Hello Ondrej,
On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> I think we started to require newer bison (although it should be checked
> by configure and complained there). We aim to be compatible with 5 year
> old systems, but RHEL/CentOS 6 is too old even for that.
while this is a good pointer
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:35:43PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm seeing the following build failures with BIRD 2.0.5 on RHEL/CentOS 6,
> while BIRD 2.0.4 worked fine (just did a BIRD version bump, not more):
> --- snipp ---
> BUILDSTDERR: obj/conf/cf-parse.y: In function
Will examine tomorrow, thank you for pointing that out.
Maria
On August 5, 2019 9:35:43 PM GMT+02:00, Robert Scheck
wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I'm seeing the following build failures with BIRD 2.0.5 on RHEL/CentOS
>6,
>while BIRD 2.0.4 worked fine (just did a BIRD version bump, not more):
>
>---
Hello all,
I'm seeing the following build failures with BIRD 2.0.5 on RHEL/CentOS 6,
while BIRD 2.0.4 worked fine (just did a BIRD version bump, not more):
--- snipp ---
BUILDSTDERR: obj/conf/cf-parse.y: In function 'cf_parse':
BUILDSTDERR: obj/conf/cf-parse.y:1918: error: unknown field 'asn'
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 07:57:49PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 01:08:18AM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
> > > + ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
> > > --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix=
> > >
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 01:08:18AM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
> > + ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
> > --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix=
> > --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr
> >
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 07:07:37PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 5 août 2019 18:28 +02, Ondrej Zajicek :
>
> >> You mean I can do:
> >>
> >> protocol bgp XXX {
> >> neighbor;
> >> interface eth0;
> >> /* ... */
> >> }
> >>
> >> ?
> >
> > No, you need to specify neighbor link-local
❦ 5 août 2019 18:28 +02, Ondrej Zajicek :
>> You mean I can do:
>>
>> protocol bgp XXX {
>> neighbor;
>> interface eth0;
>> /* ... */
>> }
>>
>> ?
>
> No, you need to specify neighbor link-local address
> (i probably misunderstood your point):
>
> protocol bgp XXX {
> neighbor fe80::1
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 06:03:53PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 5 août 2019 17:24 +02, Ondrej Zajicek :
> >> Notably:
> >>
> >> - establish a BGP session using an interface name and the associated
> >>link-local IPv6 address,
> >
> > This is already supported since long time.
>
> You
❦ 5 août 2019 17:24 +02, Ondrej Zajicek :
>> > o BGP: Dynamic BGP
>> > o BGP: Promiscuous ASN mode
>>
>> That's great! Is there a roadmap for additional features around that?
>
> In future, I would like to implement automatic BGP neighbor discovery,
> like
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 04:52:25PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 5 août 2019 09:54 +02, Ondrej Filip :
>
> > o BGP: Dynamic BGP
> > o BGP: Promiscuous ASN mode
>
> That's great! Is there a roadmap for additional features around that?
In future, I would like to implement automatic BGP
❦ 5 août 2019 09:54 +02, Ondrej Filip :
> o BGP: Dynamic BGP
> o BGP: Promiscuous ASN mode
That's great! Is there a roadmap for additional features around that?
Notably:
- establish a BGP session using an interface name and the associated
link-local IPv6 address,
- implement
Hello!
yup, that's true. We are using it for LU-CIX. While building the new
config for the new version, I have not implemented it.
thanks!
Irene
On 8/5/19 2:27 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just noticed that since transition to 2.0, BGP option 'missing lladdr'
> is not implemented. I
Hi
I just noticed that since transition to 2.0, BGP option 'missing lladdr'
is not implemented. I wonder if anyone used this option or whether we
should just remove it.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:13:06PM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> 05.08.2019 11:54, Ondrej Filip пишет:
> > Dear BIRD users,
> > we just released two new versions - 1.6.7 and 2.0.5. Many thanks
> > to Santiago and Maria!
> >
> > Version 1.6.7
> >o BFD: Support for VRFs
> >o Several
05.08.2019 11:54, Ondrej Filip пишет:
Dear BIRD users,
we just released two new versions - 1.6.7 and 2.0.5. Many thanks
to Santiago and Maria!
Version 1.6.7
o BFD: Support for VRFs
o Several bugfixes
Version 2.0.5
o OSPF Graceful restart (RFC 3623, RFC 5187)
o BGP: Dynamic BGP
o
16 matches
Mail list logo
