bfd or ospf problem?

2019-09-11 Thread Dmitry Melekhov
Hello! I run two Centos 7 servers. They are connected over ipsec+gre, both run bird 2.0.5 ospf. I also have bfd enabled: bfd yes; in this interface and protocol bfd {    interface "gre*" {     interval 200 ms;     }; }; Both sides had following

Re: BIRD 2.0.6 and 1.6.8

2019-09-11 Thread Ondrej Filip
On 12. 09. 19 0:09, Robert Scheck wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, Ondrej Filip wrote: >> we just released two new versions - 1.6.8 and 2.0.6. > > Who ever maintains ftp://bird.network.cz/pub/bird/fedora/: it could be > a good idea for the admins to fix the permissions (missing read access > for

Re: BIRD 2.0.6 and 1.6.8

2019-09-11 Thread Robert Scheck
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, Ondrej Filip wrote: > we just released two new versions - 1.6.8 and 2.0.6. Users consuming BIRD RPM packages from Fedora or EPEL (for RHEL/CentOS) repositories can get updated packages likely tomorrow or so - once they reached a mirror near to you. Alternatively the builds

BIRD 2.0.6 and 1.6.8

2019-09-11 Thread Ondrej Filip
Dear BIRD users, we just released two new versions - 1.6.8 and 2.0.6. Version 1.6.8 just includes important bugfixes. Version 2.0.6 o RAdv: Solicited unicast RAs o BGP: Optional Adj-RIB-Out o BGP: Extended optional parameters length o Filter: Sets and set expressions in path masks o

Re: Re: bird >=2.0.4 Stack underflow and most routes become filtered

2019-09-11 Thread Robert Scheck
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > We plan to release a new version soon with this and other fixes. That sounds like it makes sense for a package maintainer like me to hold my breath for a 2.0.6 - which also addresses the CVE from yesterday or so? Or is soon meant more like "in a

Re: Kernel protocol and IPv6 route issue with Bird 2.0

2019-09-11 Thread Nigel Kukard
On 9/11/19 2:23 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:31:16PM +, Nigel Kukard wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm having an issue where IPv6 routes from the kernel routing table >> don't appear to end up in my t_kernel6 table. Despite the next-hop being >> link-local and the

Re: Two similar kernel routes with different metrics on bird 1.6.4

2019-09-11 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:48:11PM +0300, Andrew wrote: > Hi all. > > I have two default kernel routes with different metrics (for failover, when > first gateway becomes unreachable - all traffic is switched to second gw). I > want to pipe it to other kernel table to gracefully handle connections

Re: Kernel protocol and IPv6 route issue with Bird 2.0

2019-09-11 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:31:16PM +, Nigel Kukard wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm having an issue where IPv6 routes from the kernel routing table > don't appear to end up in my t_kernel6 table. Despite the next-hop being > link-local and the interface being UP. > ... > Here is the error I'm

Kernel protocol and IPv6 route issue with Bird 2.0

2019-09-11 Thread Nigel Kukard
Hi guys, I'm having an issue where IPv6 routes from the kernel routing table don't appear to end up in my t_kernel6 table. Despite the next-hop being link-local and the interface being UP. IPv4 routes I have no problem with, working as expected. I must be doing something wrong on my side, if

Two similar kernel routes with different metrics on bird 1.6.4

2019-09-11 Thread Andrew
Hi all. I have two default kernel routes with different metrics (for failover, when first gateway becomes unreachable - all traffic is switched to second gw). I want to pipe it to other kernel table to gracefully handle connections to second IP. Unfortunatelly, I can't force bird to learn