On 24/09/2020 14:37, Oliver wrote:
Hello,
after upgrading to debian buster with kernel 4.19 we also had problems.
How filled is your route cache compared to the sysctl treshold? See the
(hex) value with :
cut -d'' -f 6 /proc/net/rt6_stats
Do you get a "Network is unreachable" error at some
ll be received for each subsequent "ip route get"
incantation, and v6 connectivity will be interrupted.
Thanks,
Basil
On 26/02/2020 20:38, Clément Guivy wrote:
Hi, did anyone find a solution or workaround regarding this issue?
Considering a router use case.
I have looked at rt6_stats, total rou
Hi, did anyone find a solution or workaround regarding this issue?
Considering a router use case.
I have looked at rt6_stats, total route count is around 78k (full view),
and around 4100 entries in the cache at the moment on my first router
(forwarding a few Mb/s) and around 2500 entries on my s
On 01/12/2019 13:43, Frederik Kriewitz wrote:
This is our current suspicion too. neighbours and routes are well
below 4096 in our case. We also had to adjust
net.ipv6.neigh.default.gc_thresh1/2/3. Since the adjustment it's been
working fine.
Hi, that's good news. One thing that still confuses
On 08/08/2017 22:52, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:03:00PM +0200, Clément Guivy wrote:
On 06/08/2017 12:27, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
The difference is that such bug affect only outgoing connnections, not
incoming connections. In your IBGP case, both routers are affected by the
On 06/08/2017 12:27, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
The difference is that such bug affect only outgoing connnections, not
incoming connections. In your IBGP case, both routers are affected by the
bug, so no connection is possible. In your EBGP case, incoming
connections are from hardware routers not affe
On 05/08/2017 23:55, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
I found that it is probably a bug/behavior of Linux VRF implementation.
Socket can be bound to an iface, which is also used to choose related
VRF. For UDP sockets, it works for both VRF ifaces and underlying (real)
ifaces. But for TCP (and perhaps ICMP)
On 04/08/2017 23:00, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
You could try to use 'direct' option for IBGP to run it in IBGP mode.
Thanks, I missed this difference between IBGP and EBGP. Now with this
"direct" setting it's getting better, no more complaining from the service.
However BGP session is now stuck i
Hello, I am trying to set up 2 BIRD routers as AS border routers (on Debian
9).
Installation is as follows :
|BIRD router 1|-IBGP-|BIRD router 2|
| |
EBGP EBGP
| |
|Hardware router 1|
Thanks everyone for your answers, that's very helpful to me :-)
On 07/03/2017 19:46, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 7 March 2017 at 05:57, Clément Guivy mailto:clem...@guivy.fr>>wrote:
Hello, I am considering the setup of BIRD as a router to handle our
internet traffic. One in
. By the way, is BIRD able to use multiple
cores ? and are there hardware requirements to be careful of, disregard CPU
and RAM ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Clément Guivy
11 matches
Mail list logo
