On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:06:15AM +0100, Eric GITAU wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 3:19 AM Ondrej Zajicek
> > Hi
> >
> > This 'rejected by protocol' is completely harmless. That just means pe1
> > reject it back - no need to send the route back to the peer.
>
&
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:09:06PM +0100, wax xitau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Prefixes sent over a eBGP session are getting rejected "by protocol" as can
> be seen in the logs below.
> The prefixes are "added" and then get "rejected" by protocol.
Hi
This 'rejected by protocol' is completely harmless.
On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 10:37:04AM +, Marian Rychtecký wrote:
> Hi,
> is this what you're looking for?
>
> sh route table all where (111, 222, 333) ~ bgp_large_community
Or you can use multiple 'table' options to explicitly specify which
tables.
> On 07-Dec-19 23:02:52, "Logan Rawlins"
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 07:30:27AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 15:59 +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe reply code issue is caused by the following lines since reply
> > > code 3 is used twice...
> > >
>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:26:45PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 16:02 +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 17:26 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> &g
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:36:16PM +, Mazur, Dariusz wrote:
> Hello Ondrej,
> Thanks for quick response. I use 2.0.5
Well, this feature is supported since 2.0.6. I would suggest to upgrade
to 2.0.7.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 03:01:05PM +, Mazur, Dariusz wrote:
> Hello Bird users,
>
> I am trying to filter routing table entries based on as-path regex ( I try
> to write regex: 32934 (3|5|7) )
>
> bird> show route all where bgp_path ~ [= 32934 [3,5,7] =]
> syntax error, unexpected '[' ->
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:09:24PM +, Andrew Hearn wrote:
> > Without traffic through the box (all IPv6 prefixes filtered) the bgp
> > sessions is stable. With traffic the bgp session dies after some time
> > and ssh connections in the default table freezes.
> >
> > I did some packet captures
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:26:04PM +0100, Maria Matějka wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It may be GCC; I have just compiled BIRD on GCC 4.7.2 on Debian Wheezy.
Yes, Debian 7 (Wheezy) is oldest we test builds on. Debian 6 (Squeeze) we
considered too old to care.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:54:42AM +0300, Twana Othman wrote:
> Hello Friends,
>
> I have some prefixes to export to my BGP peer and I want to set a
> communities when I am sending them. So, can you instruct me the syntax of
> how to sent this community (100:12) to my prefixes ? please
Hello
In
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 09:06:31AM +0100, Patrik Rehuš wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In my topology I have 2 parallel connections from one host to the same
> destination. The goal is to switch route to another one under 1 second (in
> case of broken link). For this I used OSPF with BFD. BFD use 40ms
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:16:57PM +0100, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> Hey Ondrej,
>
> very nice and also nice short patch!
>
> Do you plan to create a new release soon? Otherise I'll give it a try
> from git directly.
Probably during 2019-12.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:08:12AM +0100, Alex D. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have a problem when i try to get infos about a specific IPv6 FlowSpec
> route by issuing "show route " or "show route all".
Hello
Thanks, here is a fix:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 06:38:09PM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bird> show route all 0.0.0.0/0
> Table master4:
> 0.0.0.0/0unicast [ospf_ipv4 12:15:31.798] I (150/30)
> [89.234.186.31]
> via 45.91.126.233 on tinc0 weight 1
> via 45.91.126.235 on tinc0 weight
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 12:41:39PM +0100, Tiemen Ruiten wrote:
> I compiled and installed Bird 1.6.8 from source and the following
> configuration works:
Hi
Seems like your original config did not have channels for direct protocol,
should be:
protocol direct {
ipv4;
ipv6;
interface
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 07:58:43PM +0100, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have setup an MP-BGP with 2 bird instances and my aim is to route IPv4
> via IPv6, like cumulus is doing it.
>
> Currently I receive the IPv4 and IPv6 routes via the IPv6 session, as
> follows:
>
>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:41:24AM -0500, Matthias Waehlisch wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Maria Matějka wrote:
>
> > The problem is also that bird doesn't reevaluate affected routes after
> > ROA has changed. This is going to be fixed in near future
> >
> based on the increasing interest in
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 05:12:28PM +0100, Chris Althage wrote:
> I cannot get my OSPF routes to show up in my Linux Routing table. I have
> tried multiple configurations, but the routes never populate into Linux.
> They are present in the Bird Interface, but not outside of Bird. I'm sorry
> for
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 07:58:43PM +0100, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have setup an MP-BGP with 2 bird instances and my aim is to route IPv4
> via IPv6, like cumulus is doing it.
>
> Currently I receive the IPv4 and IPv6 routes via the IPv6 session, as
> follows:
>
> 58.69.253.0/24
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 03:51:03PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 16:10 +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:08:31PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does bird support OSPF graceful restart for unplanned outage? The doc
> only speaks about planned outage. Section 5 in RFC 3623 describes that
> OSPF GR mechanism may be used for unplanned outage.
No
--
Elen sila lumenn'
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:26:07PM +0200, Philippe Duke wrote:
> Hello, Ondrej.
>
> I think like this is the option for now. Would like to try gain some
> experience with protocol implementations in spare time if I have one.
>
> Tired of my current operational job routine.
>
>
> Just want to
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 05:41:34PM +0200, Philippe Duke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does someone has an effort to implement
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-19 for BGP?
>
> I see there is a difficulty in 4.1 in IGP metric. As far as I know, most
> of vendors are currently using IGP
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:33:58PM +0100, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> when trying to reload a fully compatible/correct configuration file in
> bird 2.0.6 or 2.0.7, I get the following answer:
>
> bird> reload
> syntax error, unexpected END
Hello
Command to reload configuration is
Hi
I just found another tool related to BIRD and updated and
reorganized 'Related software' page on BIRD wiki:
https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/wikis/Related
I wonder if you know more software worth mentioning there.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 08:15:54PM +0800, Winston Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am wondering if there is a way an application can be notified when BFD
> session status changes.
>
> I know currently I can check the BFD session by polling with birdc or
> scanning the log, but if there is some way I
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 02:18:16PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > What is your config? It is possible that you have some 'keep filtered'
> > routes in net->routes for 0.0.0.0/0?
>
> Configuration looks like this;
Hi
Thanks, fixed (commit 498d8145c0984acf6b39d7e312950315571e7030).
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:22:35PM -0400, Darren O'Connor wrote:
> Hi Maria.
>
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding the RPKI instances. My local bird2 instance is
> connected to two routinator cache servers. Both are sending IPv4 and IPv6
> information over. This is the outputs of both on this particular
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:31:21PM -0400, Darren O'Connor wrote:
> I recently moved from bird to bird2. I'm currently using it as a backend to
> bgpstuff.net, a looking glass.
>
> In order to check the ROA status for a prefix in bird1 I did the following,
> and got the following result:
>
>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:40:42PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> > But i do not understand the cases below, where there is no other route
> > for that network and the only route does not have asterisk.
>
> Simplest of use case, its a default route from the kernel. But still no
> asterisk. Below
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:11:31AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When showing routing table, the output can have '*', '!' or empty depending
> on the route. I thought that the asterisk ('*')
> meant that the route is a primary route installed into the kernel. But this
> does not seem
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:13:37PM +0200, Boris Tassou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's my first mail here so, sorry if i missed something.
>
> I updated my bird to the 2.0.7 version on a FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p10 and
> i have an error with a if cond :
>
> Oct 22 14:37:32 scipio bird[1199]: filters, line
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:57:18AM +0300, Igor Gavrilov wrote:
> Hello BIRD users.
> Recently I have upgraded one of our router to Centos 8 with BIRD2 and
> faced strange issue with rt_tables parsing.
> When I have custom tables named with capital letters, for example:
>
> 128 AAA
> 129 BBB
>
>
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Fabrice Fontaine wrote:
> Build without babel, bgp, ospf, radv, rip or static fails on:
Thanks, merged.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:41:45PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does bird support a static prefix with multiple nexthops, without
> installing all of them in the kernel as ECMP?
Hi
I think that you are talking about multiple routes/paths with the same
prefix. Static protocol currently
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> > We implemented extension for next-hop-self in version 2.0.3 that allows
> > to specify 'next hop self ebgp', this solves exactly this issue.
> >
> > For older versions, you would need to workaround that in filters,
> > something
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:58:36AM +0200, Jan-Philipp Litza wrote:
> I assume this is equivalent to a "restart"? That didn't change anything.
> I even restarted bird on RR. Note, though, that RR is a redundant
> system, so there is always another peer RR' that has the exact same route.
And if you
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:08:50AM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Hi - I have a topology like this, using BIRD 1.6.7:
>
> I want BIRD-B to reflect routes within its own AS, but also propagate
> routes to and from AS 65001. So for the eBGP peering I have
> My question is how to get the ideal
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:28:56PM +0200, Jan-Philipp Litza wrote:
> > Important info was 'gateway recursive' option on direct BGP sessions,
> > so all three BGP sessions generate recursive routes.
>
> There are only two sessions involved. Or do you mean sessions as in
> "protocol
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:22:36AM +0200, Jan-Philipp Litza wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> > Not really sure how that might happen with direct session. What is your
> > BIRD version and configs? What routes do you have in routing table?
>
> I'm using a self-compiled bird 2.0.6. RR and R1 have
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 04:57:28PM +0200, Jan-Philipp Litza wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> maybe this question boils down to "How can I tell bird to always use
> global IPv6 addresses as nexthops". But let me give you a sketch of my
> problem:
>
> RR R1 R2
>
> Addresses:
> RR 2001:db8:1::100,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 09:45:54AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 11:34 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> The broken 2.0.6 tag I had locally was
> 3a22a6e858cd703d254ab331183ccd56fe195c6b, which is only six commits
> after 2.0.4. But I have now deleted that e
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 07:53:53AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 06:45 +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 18:34 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 02:38:13PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> > > > &g
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 02:38:13PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> > The prio change is user driven, the user changed from prio 0 to 5 and
> > then re-configured. So now bird has prio 5 and quagga 0. Initially both
> > ends had prio 0.
> >
> Shouldn't the interface state machine be kicked when
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:23:56PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Collected some more logs when the state machine becomes stuck. It
> appears as the eth1 has been DR when this stuck state happens. Note
> that interface transitions from Down to DROther in one step and then
> maintains that state
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 10:43:00AM +, Christoph wrote:
> >>> Reject RPKI INVALID announcement 200.124.231.0/24 by AS0
> >
> >>
> >> So I was wondering:
> >> - Did I incorrectly assume first match wins?
> >> - Is the reject_bogon_asns() function not working as intended?
> >
> > Hello
> >
> >
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:19:00PM +, Christoph wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (please keep me in CC)
>
> we use filters from
> https://bgpfilterguide.nlnog.net/
>
> One of the first functions checks for bogon ASNs
> way before the RPKI ROA check:
>
> > filter transit_in {
> >
> >
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:00:00PM +, Christoph wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use a transit_in filter that checks the
> net.type to decide which roa_check parameter to use:
>
> Is this significantly less efficient than having separate IPv4/6 filters
> that do not need that additional if (net.type =
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 12:00:16AM +0200, Maria Matejka wrote:
> > The two main points being so far:
> > - security: no privilege dropping on BSD
>
> This is not so easy when BIRD has to keep its privilege to open sockets
> on port < 1024. There would be three different implementations for
>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 09:07:00PM +, Christoph wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (reminder: please keep me in CC, the mailing list issue is still unsolved)
>
> so far we get the impression that BIRD on BSD appears to
> be somewhat less supported when compared to Linux based systems.
Hello
That is true.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On jeu. 3 oct. 21:07:00 2019, Christoph wrote:
> > - security: no privilege dropping on BSD
>
> regis ~ # ps aux | grep bird
> root 31131 4.2 3.6 607704 602720 ? Ss Apr05 10956:29
> /usr/sbin/bird -s
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 06:36:05PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > me.dr is 0 because ifa->drip is 0, but should it have declared itself
> > as an eligible DR?
>
> Oh, you meant DR IP, not neghbor IP. I think that it is correct - the
> process should start with the n
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:49:23PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We are having a problem were sometimes bird ospf neighbor state machine
> becomes stuck in a 2-way state. This happens when two broadcast
> interfaces are connected, one of them is running quagga and the other
> end is
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 08:13:17PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use OSPF over an openvpn link. tcpdump tells me that both
> ends send their HELLO packet but bird does not want to recognize them.
>
> When looking at ospf_rc_hook() in proto/ospf/packet.c the HELLO
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 07:28:22PM +0200, mikma.b...@lists.m7n.se wrote:
> On 30 September 2019 01:52:22 CEST, Ondrej Zajicek
>
> > Yes. Technically it is not because the other route is also BGP, but
> > because the other route is also recursive / also has indirect next hop.
&
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:15:45PM +0800, Winston Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using BFD neighbor to config BFD sessions statically. I found that if I
> add/remove BFD neighbors in bird.conf and ask bird to reload with HUP
> signal, bird cannot reload the configuration correctly.
> ...
> After
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 08:49:57PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that bird can’t resolve the next-hop in that case. But there is
> no issue when the next-hop is announced by OSPF.
Hello
Yes. Technically it is not because the other route is also BGP, but
because the other
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 02:12:00PM +, Christoph wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (please keep me in CC the mailing list issues are still not solved)
>
> we get the following WARN log entry exactly once a minute:
>
> I/O loop cycle took 6343 ms for 2 events
>
> Is this something to worry about?
> Is
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 03:47:39PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When an OSPF key lifetime expires then bird stops using that key. E.g.
> if the configured parameter "generate from time" expires, then bird
> reverts to an OSPF interface in unauthenticated mode.
>
> Is this intentional?
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:39:50PM +0200, Irene Lalioti wrote:
> Thanks a lot Ondrej! I will alter my code likewise,
>
> For the bgp communities inside the parenthesis, is it with : or , ?
> seems with , works as well.
BGP communities uses ',' - i copied it from your code and missed that.
--
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:24:29PM +0200, Irene Lalioti wrote:
> Děkuji moc Ondrej!
>
> That was needed, because I had altered it initially to this after having
> checked the ripe's slides
>
> https://ripe78.ripe.net/wp-content/uploads/presentations/68-inex-ripe-reykjavik-rpki-2019-05-22.pdf
>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:58:11AM +0200, Irene Lalioti wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Can you please let me know where is the syntax error in my snippet , or
> if it is wrong how else I should integrate it in a way bird doesn't
> complain? Thanks in advance!
Hello
- As noticed by Barry O'Donovan, it
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:36:20AM +0100, Barry O'Donovan wrote:
> Hi Irene,
>
> looks like you're trying to put together a route server config?
>
> First thing that jumps out at me is you have "roa check" but it should
> be "roa_check".
>
> We have full working sample configs that are used in
human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
commit ca2dacfcee92d8cfecff74dd020c2d16202b0d5c
Author: Ondrej Zajicek (work)
Date: Tue Sep 24 17:12:15 2019 +0200
Nest: Fix bug in export table
Exported route may be in modified state, we need to get cached one for
rte_same() a
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:18:00PM +, Christoph wrote:
> > If you can add 'debug { events, states };' option to the RPKI option,
> > could you send me the logs during protocol initialization? There should
> > be some part with 'Connected' and 'Changing ... state'.
> >
>
> I disabled and
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 10:01:00PM +, Christoph wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 01:10:00AM +0200, Christoph wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> (please keep me in CC, thanks)
> >>
> >> I got the following somewhat strangely formatted
> >> log lines in /var/log/messages on a BIRD v2.0.6 instance
> >>
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 01:10:00AM +0200, Christoph wrote:
> Hi,
> (please keep me in CC, thanks)
>
> I got the following somewhat strangely formatted
> log lines in /var/log/messages on a BIRD v2.0.6 instance
> connected to routinator3000 v0.5 ("r3k" bellow)
> running on FreeBSD 12:
Hi
That is
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 07:54:10PM +0200, Christoph wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to the documentation BIRD can not drop privileges on BSD systems:
>
> "The privilege restriction is not implemented in BSD port of BIRD."
>
> Is privilege dropping on the roadmap that we will see in the future on
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 01:56:06PM +0200, Christoph wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > o Graceful restart command
>
> but I didn't see it in the "?" output so I assumed it does not exist:
>
> ...>
> By using "g", auto-completion revealed the existence of the command
> and it works as intended.
>
> bird>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:09:38PM +0200, mattia.mil...@studenti.unitn.it wrote:
> Hello all, I’m writing this email because i was trying to create an input
> filter for my daemon.
>
> Protocol: BGP
> I would like to evaluate an input path and change the bgp preference if the
> path correspond
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Barry O'Donovan wrote:
>
> Ondrej Zajicek wrote on 19/09/2019 19:32:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 04:13:52PM +, Matt Corallo wrote:
> >> Sometimes showing export table(s) from birdc on 2.0.6 results in a
> >> Segfault
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:25:45AM +0200, daniele wrote:
> Nice, will try that. One additional question: if leverage kernel protocol,
> it means local routing tables already contain the default learnt through
> DHCP. Wouldn't this generate some kind of warning (ie. bird4: Netlink: File
> exists)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 04:13:52PM +, Matt Corallo wrote:
> Sometimes showing export table(s) from birdc on 2.0.6 results in a
> Segfault of the bird daemon. I can try to debug further if this isn't
> sufficient, but largely the only difference between one protocol and the
> other is the
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:53:30AM +0200, daniele wrote:
> Hello list,
> I???m looking for some advice from someone that has more experience. I'm
> running bird 1.6.6.
> I have two routers R1 and R2, each with a single internet uplink U1 and U2,
> running OSPF and sharing a LAN ethernet segment.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 02:46:15PM +0900, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> being a bird 1.6 user (Debian), I find myself often
> in the situation that I'd like to define a variable in either bird.conf
> or bird6.conf and have a general.conf that defines the filters used in
> both
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:11:45AM -0400, Liam Nattrass wrote:
> Hey Ondrej,
>
> Good point... Perhaps we can specify an instance ID (which doesn't appear
> to be used in the BGP proto anywhere) to differentiate dynamic instances
> from static instances? (See patch)
Hi
Using instance ID is a
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 07:58:07PM -0400, Liam Nattrass wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was doing some work with dynamic neighbors in BGP, and found that I am
> not able to use multiple protocol definitions with neighbor ranges.
> Connections to the second and subsequent definitions are rejected.
>
>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 01:42:45PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Kees Meijs writes:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > Since our business is using BIRD (and Debian) a lot I just contact
> > Ondřej Surý and volunteered for help in terms of maintaining the package.
> >
> > My goals are to (try to)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:41:20AM +0200, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> What would it take to get this
>
> > Version 2.0.6
> > o RAdv: Solicited unicast RAs
>
> "backported" to 1.6.x ?
Hi
Well, we do not plan to backport new features to 1.6.x, only bugfixes.
Any reason why this feature should be
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 03:43:07PM -0500, Chris Herdt wrote:
> I have a number of routes that include non-standard bgp_ext_community
> entries, for example unknown 0x10b (VRF Route Import).
>
> Is there a way to filter bgp_ext_community for only route targets?
>
> I tried the following, but the
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:19:49PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a weird setup with a transit. My next-hop is 2a03:94e0:feff::
> (with a multihop session) which is reachable via 2a03:94e0:17ff::1 which
> is on-link on eno1. (your should already tear blood here)
>
> So, when I
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:48:11PM +0300, Andrew wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have two default kernel routes with different metrics (for failover, when
> first gateway becomes unreachable - all traffic is switched to second gw). I
> want to pipe it to other kernel table to gracefully handle connections
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:31:16PM +, Nigel Kukard wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm having an issue where IPv6 routes from the kernel routing table
> don't appear to end up in my t_kernel6 table. Despite the next-hop being
> link-local and the interface being UP.
> ...
> Here is the error I'm
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 04:28:17PM +0200, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> For now only OSPF authentication drops...
Hi
Please check commit 60dda81b825725716c0f5ba65256e9a4c3f45948 (not part of
master branch):
https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/commit/60dda81b825725716c0f5ba65256e9a4c3f45948
That has
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 01:22:10AM +0300, Дружок 1 wrote:
> Hi!
> ..
> /var/log/bird.log
> 2019-08-22 15:38:38.604 filters, line 1023: Stack underflow
> 2019-08-22 18:02:27.157 filters, line 511: Stack underflow
> 2019-08-22 18:02:30.616 filters, line 0: Stack underflow
>
> then I issue
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 10:42:06AM -0400, Daniel McCarney wrote:
> > Done. I'll update this thread when MITRE replies.
>
> Assigned CVE-2019-16159
Thanks, we will release fixed versions soon.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP
On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:54:35PM -0400, Daniel McCarney wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> > Unfortunately it has been included in released versions 1.6.7 and 2.0.5.
>
> Bummer, apologies for missing that. Do you want to request a CVE or should I?
If you could, i
On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 01:59:03PM -0400, Daniel McCarney wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I believe a stack overflow was introduced in the BGP protocol support of BIRD
> in
> 7ff34ca2[1] that allows a BGP peer to corrupt stack memory via crafted RFC
> 8203[0] BGP administrative shutdown communication
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:19:34PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Is it possible to see ospf authentication status from bird cli? I have
> seen that authentication failures are logged to file, but it would be
> good to have it visible in cli as well.
No, we do not keep track of unauthenticated
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:50:28AM -0400, alpha_one_x86 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If OSPF is diconnected, when I reconnect it not comeback up, I need restart
> bird.
>
> Why this?
Hi
This should not happen. Which BIRD version? Do you have any error
messages in log? Do you see any strange behavior in
n sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
commit 56d8b1e7f6252158caf0ecd3147376b858b16d97
Author: Ondrej Zajicek (work)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 07:02:38PM +, Van Dyk, Donovan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone eve ran into the issue of the date reporting for an established
> BGP peer being reset to 00:00:00 when it rolls over to a new day using peer
> status?
> It appears that when the session rolls into the next
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 07:39:32PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Hello
>
> There is a patch for BIRD in FreeBSD ports that causes OSPF crash:
>
> ...
> I would suggest to send BIRD patches for review to the BIRD mailing list
> so we can review it and also merge it
Hello
There is a patch for BIRD in FreeBSD ports that causes OSPF crash:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision=484648
22 + if (en->lsa_body && (en->lsa.age == LSA_MAXAGE))
23 + {
24 +/* en could be an unexpected self-originated lsa in which case nf
is NULL */
25
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:30:04PM +0500, Vasily Oleynikov wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a bird 1.6.3 installation where is over 500k static routes. From some
> moment service reconfiguring occupies significant time (over 20 minutes).
> Is there some method to reduce time needed to reconfigure? My
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 09:06:55PM +0800, James Swineson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Linux server and a Cisco IOS XE device connected with GRE/IPSec and
> then can ping each other. Today I installed Bird 2.0.5 on the Linux server
> and enabled OSPFv2 on both of them. Although they receive HELLO
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 01:22:10AM +0300, Дружок 1 wrote:
> Hi!
> ..
> /var/log/bird.log
> 2019-08-22 15:38:38.604 filters, line 1023: Stack underflow
> 2019-08-22 18:02:27.157 filters, line 511: Stack underflow
> 2019-08-22 18:02:30.616 filters, line 0: Stack underflow
>
> Re: bird >=2.0.4
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:30:53PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >> # ip r a 2001:db8:1:14::/64 via 2001:db8:1:1::14
> >> # route -6 add 2001:db8:1:15::/64 gw 2001:db8:1:1::15
> >
> > This command uses the old ioctl(SIOCADDRT) API which in turn generates
> >
> >> none 2001:db8:1:15::/64
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Tom Bird wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently updated some virtual machine hosting nodes to Debian Buster from
> Stretch, and I'm having an interesting problem with IPv6 kernel routes. My
> example uses 1.6.6 but 1.6.7 shows the same behaviour, so I'm just
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:05:50AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 15:04 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
601 - 700 of 1397 matches
Mail list logo
