On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:46:28AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> > > We don't have multipath enabled in our kernel
> > > (CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH). How does bird tell whether the kernel
> > > supports multipath? Probing run time via netlink? Didn't find any
> > > configure.ac option.
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 01:15:02PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> We have some multi-path routes that fails to get pushed into the
> kernel. We are running bird 2.0.3 and kernel 4.14.92+.
>
>
> bird> show route
> ...
> Table master4:
>
> 10.210.138.3/32 unicast [ospf1 13:24:23.022] E1
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 04:54:51PM +, Ticlea Alexandru wrote:
> Hello
> According to user guide, the next line looks correct but it leads to a syntax
> error
> log "/var/log/bird.log" 102400 "/var/log/bird.log-prev" { info, remote,
> warning, error, auth, fatal, bug };
> Can we help me to
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 02:28:52PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> After upgrading from bird 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 we discovered that bird pushes
> connected routes to the kernel. Tried to alter the preference values
> for kernel and device, but bird still pushes the connected routes,
> resulting in
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 09:06:59AM +, Leo Vandewoestijne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not the FreeBSD port maintainer for bird, however did wrote the initial
> bird2 port.
> In there I created the interface to "assemble" which protocols you wish, by
> un/checking checkboxes.
> This allows to
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 12:12:58PM +, firas73...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hello BIRD-users,
> I am running BIRD version 1.6.3 for about one year now and everything seems
> to be ok. I've just changed some configuration (set next-hop of a route to
> some IP address) and then issued a "configure"
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 05:17:17PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 6 février 2019 16:47 +01, Ondrej Zajicek :
>
> > I cannot give precise ETA for our/official packages, as it is a bit
> > organizationally complex, depends on multiple people, and we are often
> > interr
(Did not pass due to attachements, resending)
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:38:43AM +0100, Cybertinus wrote:
> Hello Bird users,
>
> Is there any ETA for the packages for Bird 1.6.5 and 2.0.3?
>
> I'm running a production network with Bird and I want to upgrade my Debian
> routers to the latest
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 04:01:27PM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> On mer. 6 févr. 15:51:56 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > This depends on version/variant of autoconf tools. Older ones do not
> > support --runstatedir. INSTALL instructions are intended for released
> >
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:21:41PM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> It looks good from there too:
> asbr01-lab /usr/local/src/bird # birdc -s /run/bird.ctl
> BIRD v2.0.3-12-g6e8fb668 ready.
> It’s not related to OSPF, but there is an error in INSTALL:
> asbr01-lab /usr/local/src # git clone
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:39:52AM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> >From which URL can I fetch the code at this commit?
> The “download” link on
> https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/commit/6e8fb66859a17b295cd9246264221a75cdbe6c55
> is disabled.
Here should be enabled:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 03:12:12PM +0200, michal.no...@lnk.ro wrote:
> We've upgraded to 2.0.3 (from 1.6.3) and observed that the number of exported
> routes shown in the protocol details ('show protocol all') does not match (by
> large) these show in 'show route export PROTOCOL count'.
Hi
I
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 09:14:21AM +0200, michal.no...@lnk.ro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 02:50:39PM +0300, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> > This is likely just integer overflow during counter decrease, it is
> > mostly harmless. We will see how to fix it.
>
> Hi
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 04:37:36PM +0300, Ilya Evseev wrote:
> Hi all!
> There is a problem in time output.
> Consider timeformat protocol "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S";
> ...
> As you can see, time is changed by 1 second.
> That's bad for monitoring when it's configured to alert on time/state
> changes.
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 03:12:12PM +0200, michal.no...@lnk.ro wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> We've upgraded to 2.0.3 (from 1.6.3) and observed that the number of exported
> routes shown in the protocol details ('show protocol all') does not match (by
> large) these show in 'show route export PROTOCOL
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 05:27:27PM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just FYI, I had the same issue with a BGP session today:
BTW, it is possible that it is triggered by change/reconfiguration of export
filters?
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 05:27:27PM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just FYI, I had the same issue with a BGP session today:
Hi
I guess it is just an overflow in counter during its decrease.
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 02:55:29PM +0100, Eugene Crosser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to suggest to change the default name of the configuration file
> for
> bird version 2.0.
Hello
We noticed the issue when working on Debian packages for BIRD 2.0.
Renaming the config file in upstream is
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 06:44:11PM +0100, Eugene Crosser wrote:
> On 1/21/19 10:01 PM, Eugene Crosser wrote:
> > On 21/01/2019 21:20, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> [...]
> >> Or just switch to BIRD 2.0
> >
> > I will try that; I hope that I was wrong in my analysis.
&
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 01:34:08PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> Whereas it's given in some default Bird configs, I couldn't find it in manual.
Thanks, fixed (in git).
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 02:19:03AM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 02:14, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 02:07:52PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> > > I have test lab -- two OSPF routers, Bird 1.6.4: A, B.
> > >
> >
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 02:57:53PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> The docs say: "... secondary switch
>
> Let's focus on: "... Since v1.4.1, regular operation on secondary IP
> addresses is supported, but disabled by default for compatibility.
> This option allows to enable it. ..."
>
> My
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 02:07:52PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> I have test lab -- two OSPF routers, Bird 1.6.4: A, B.
>
> 2 areas defined: 0.0.0.0, 0.0.0.1. Export "all".
>
> When rfc1583compat is Off I observe default route gets propagated via
> area 0.0.0.1 in despite its interfaces have
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:14:47PM -0500, Roman Romanyak wrote:
> Hello Bird users,
>
> Does anyone know if there is a way to announce a BGP route back to the
> router it was received from.
> I need to do this for the following scenario.
Hi
I recently thought about a setup where a
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:01:54PM +0100, Eugene Crosser wrote:
> On 21/01/2019 21:20, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> >> https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/blob/master/sysdep/linux/netlink.c#L528
> >>
> >> Questions:
> >>
> >> 1. What was the j
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 06:38:21PM +0100, Eugene Crosser wrote:
> Hello all,
Hello
> we do virtual hosting, and we provide routeable /32 addresses to the
> guests. Kernel routes on the KVM host are link routes that look like this:
>
> 1.0.0.113 dev pub020304050612 proto static
>
> They are
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 01:10:03AM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> I have an instance of Bird 1.6.4 on a freshly installed OpenBSD 6.4.
>
> My study of its OSPF database shown (with birdc show ospf lsadb self)
> that there were LSAs for broadcast routes that are indicated as ones
> having "UHb" in
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 02:58:19PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> (compared to native OSPF daemon.)
>
> bird> show ospf state all
>
> area 0.0.0.0
>
> router 192.168.69.34
> distance 0
> network 192.168.69.32/29 metric 10
> external 0.0.0.0/0 metric2 1 via 192.168.69.37
> external
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38:11AM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> Or would the second "config timeout" commit version 2 instead and when
> timeout is reached would rollback from version 3 (which is equal by
> content to version 2) to version 2 instead of version 1?
Yes, this way. There is just one
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:08:45AM +0100, Shahan Agha wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Do we have any updates if there is official Cent OS 7 rpm for bird-2.0.3 or
> bird-2.0.2 to be released any soon?
>
> There was a thread mentioning that packages for bird 2.0 are expected with
> next release.
Hi
I
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 09:34:21PM +, marcelo henrique wrote:
> Hi People,
>
> In this week, was released a new version the bird, version bird-2.0.3.tar.gz
> but i don't found version to ubuntu packages.
>
> Would be possible to release the version package to ubuntu ?
Hi
We plan to
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:38:12AM +0100, Julien Sansonnens wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> policy routing was exactly what I was looking for, thanks for your help
> I managed to have it done using the "secondary" switch, it's working great.
Hi
'secondary' switch could be used for that, but note that
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 02:43:59PM +0100, Jakub Nowacki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running BIRD on Arista switch that allows entering bash. What I want to
> achieve is to have logs from BIRD being integrated into Switch OS. Meaning
> when BIRD logs a message it will appear in the output of 'show
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 11:10:00PM +, Xavier Trilla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For some route selection configurations I need to check the bgp_path.len
> without some AS numbers.
>
> I tried something like:
>
> bgp_path.delete(AS_1);
> bgp_path.delete(AS_2);
>
> if bgp_path.len < N then ...
>
>
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 10:57:45PM +0100, Julien Sansonnens wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply.
>
> I understand the logic, but I'm sure there must be a way to choose the
> routes one want to export?
>
> Imagine I have two upstreams, and two peered networks (say: customers).
>
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 07:25:50PM +0100, Ralf Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks for interesting logs, it is possible that this is a kernel bug,
> > the implementation is pretty fresh and there were few issues with it in
> > the past.
>
> I was beginning to suspect the same.
>
> What would be a
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 03:52:53PM +0100, Ralf Jung wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I have now also played around with bird 2.0 a bit, but got the same result:
> IPv4
> works, but IPv6 says "Cannot assign requested address". I have attached my
> stripped-down configuration, which (as far as I can tell)
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 03:10:28PM +0100, Ralf Jung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am playing around with VRFs in our network, and I am having trouble getting
> bird6 to establish its BGP sessions inside a VRF. Strangely, bird for IPv4
> works with pretty much the same configuration.
Hi
What is the
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:01:52PM +, Arthur Gautier wrote:
> Hello bird users,
>
> Today I tried to upgrade one of platform to from linux 4.19 to linux 4.20.
> I started noticing the bgp protocol could not start after this message:
>uplink: Waiting for 1.2.3.4 to become my neighbor
>
>
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
commit 532116e7e33d80a79e176f043defffbfc2b8d06e
Author: O
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 03:26:08PM -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> There is no reason to disallow the former class e address
> space, except in a bogon file.
Hi
> static inline int ip4_is_unicast(ip4_addr a)
> -{ return _I(a) < 0xe000; }
> +{ return _I(a) < 0xe000 || (_I(a) >= 0xf000 &&
> diff --git a/doc/LinuxDocTools.pm b/doc/LinuxDocTools.pm
> index 39bb401..d73fc75 100644
> --- a/doc/LinuxDocTools.pm
> +++ b/doc/LinuxDocTools.pm
> @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ sub process_options
># removes iso-entites sub directory after doing make install.)
>#
>$ENV{SGML_CATALOG_FILES}
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:47:32AM +0100, Francis Brosnan Blázquez wrote:
> Hello Kurt.
>
> By your solution, would it be possible to announce no prefix over the
> upstream that you want to shutdown (export none;)?
Hello
Generally it does not matter if you announce no prefixes, withdraw old
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 09:48:52PM +0100, Cybertinus wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Today I was experimenting with a Bird setup. All the Bird machines are
> CentOS 7.6 VMs running in Virtualbox on my laptop. When I add an OSPF
> virtual link to hook up two area 0's together I get a segfault of
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:20:50PM +, James Oakley wrote:
> I am trying to get OSPF working via OSPF and it looks like BIRD is
> ignoring OSPF packets coming in on the VRF interfaces. As far as I can
> tell from the documentation, I have all of the pieces in place, but the
> protocol is stuck
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:10:43PM +0500, Vladimir Osmolovskiy wrote:
> On the master branch. Config file don't change.
>
> protocol static {
> route 20.1.100.0 /24 multipath
> via 10.10.10.2 weight 10;
> }
Hi
Seems that the issue is specific to static ECMP routes, which we forgot
to clean
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:03:50AM +, Derek Pan wrote:
> Hi developer,
>
> Does BIRD support graceful restart feature for OSPF?
Hi
Not currently, but it is something that we plan for first half of 2019.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:06:02PM +0500, Vladimir Osmolovskiy wrote:
> Hello!
> In CLI command line, after 'configure' command, pointer to static routes
> in neighbor structure not valid.
Hello
Thanks for the bugreport. In which version and under what circumstances
it happens (e.g.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:30:36PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yes, sounds reasonable. But I worry configure command could be
> overabused with all that features, like:
> configue soft keepstate keepdebug keepsomethingelse :)
I would prefer one common keep flag for all cases
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:03:23PM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello Ondrej,
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Build of documentation is integrated in main build system, so you are not
> > supposed to do 'make -C doc', but use make with appropriate targ
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 03:32:36PM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With bird1, I can know how much routes are used for each protocol just
> by parsing birdc:
> [alarig@nominoe ~]$ birdc show protocols all bgp_breizhix | grep 'Routes:'
> Routes: 75 imported, 0 filtered, 4 exported,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:30:02PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have received no feedback on this suggestion and suppose it got
> lost. I would be glad to hear some comments about this improvement.
Hello
Sorry for not responding earlier. It seems to me that although the issue
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:29:58AM +, marcelo henrique wrote:
> May, Then some time has passed.
>
> Someone have some news about this or any prediction ? In Our enterprise we
> would like using bird 2.0 but we need the packages for ubuntu.
Hi, we plan to release new version during
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 01:43:46AM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to build the documentation of BIRD 2.0.2 on Fedora and RHEL/
> CentOS 7 which fails like this:
>
> --- snipp ---
> + /usr/bin/make -j4 -C doc
Hello
Build of documentation is integrated in main build system,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 01:41:47PM +0100, Christoffer Hansen wrote:
>
>
> On 14/11/2018 03:10, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > I don't know about Ubuntu, but on Debian it is straightforward (although
> > note that main devel branch is called 'int-new', while 'master' is still
&
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:32:54PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How can I announce one OSPF host route for all my unnumbered
> interfaces? I don't want to inject it as a static route and export it
> as such.
Hi
You could use 'stubnet' option to announce prefix as stub network in
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> > Not sure how to achieve the same in BIRD.
>
> While you are at it … (sorry for riding along on your thread)
>
> It raises the general question of „how does one extract certain data from
> different protocols“, i.e. into a
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 08:21:12AM +0100, Lukas Liebig wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use BIRD 2.0.2 and want the OSPF daemon to announce the Linux kernel
> routing metric. For instance, if I run "ip route add table 44 to 10.2.3.0/24
> metric 1234 dev eth0", I want this route to propagate into BIRD.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:35:49PM -0800, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> > git clone https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird.git
> > cd bird
> > git checkout int-new
> > autoreconf
> > ./configure
> > make
>
> The
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:11:58PM +0100, Christoffer Hansen wrote:
> Hi Maria,
>
> On 13/11/2018 21:29, Maria Jan Matějka wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, in version 2 you may use the dual stack babel protocol. Feel free
> > to try it and report any bug please.
>
> Wish I could.
>
> Tried compiling
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:15:34PM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:53:35AM +, Mikkelsen, Asbjorn wrote:
> > Bird/Bird6 can wrongly report wrong LSA collisions and stop working. A route
> > fib can in certain cases be released (believing nobody
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:53:35AM +, Mikkelsen, Asbjorn wrote:
> Bird/Bird6 can wrongly report wrong LSA collisions and stop working. A route
> fib can in certain cases be released (believing nobody are using them) and
> still be used (but not dereferenced).
>
> A PR can be found here:
>
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 01:19:19PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Can this be considered a bug and fixed so any "rs client" session would not
> receive prepend? Or current behaviour is relied on by some production
> systems?
Hi
The change was intentional (to be consistent with route reflector
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:57:04PM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> hi,
>
> my config:
>
> filter export2kernel {
>
> if net ~ 192.168.12.0/24 then {
> ifname = "vti0";
> accept;
> }
>
> }
>
>
> should bird recoqnize if the link goes down and comes up again?
In this case
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 01:56:29PM +0700, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> > You can use filters: show route table r4 where net.asn = 4711
>
> But
>
> show route table r4 where net = 1.1.1.0/24
> or even
> show route table r4 for 1.1.1.1
>
> doesn’t work. It that by design or just an
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:28:00AM +0700, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> > Currently ROA has to be specified as a whole, including maxlen and ASN,
> > not just its prefix. Confusingly, it uses slightly different syntax
> > to enter ROAs and to print ROAs:
> >
> > bird> show route 212.1.128.0/19 max 19
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 04:48:10PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Wow. This settings makes route via interface only? I.e. also undefines
> gateway?
Yes. Gateway and iface are interconnected, which has some minor weird
effects in filter language, like setting gw resets iface (to one
associated
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:28:44PM +0200, Semion Lisyansky wrote:
> protocol bgp bgp_vrf01_n2 {
> vrf "vrf01";
> local as 65034;
> bfd yes;
> graceful restart;
> neighbor 192.34.1.4 as 65001;
> ipv4 {
> table table_vrf01;
>
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 09:51:33PM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> hi,
>
>
> I want to export a route learned from BGP to the kernel. but I want to
> modify the route while exporting because I want to use a VTI instead of
> the next hop route.
>
>
> So instead of 192.168.0.0/24 via
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 03:05:17PM +0200, Semion Lisyansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find below requested info. Some omitted because of size
> You may clearly see the issue on 1st show
Thanks for info.
You are using single-hop EBGP, therefore next hop is not resolved
through a routing table, but
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:47:36AM +0700, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> Hello -
>
> just wanted to report a little (easily reproducable) problem: I’m
> experimenting with BIRD 2.0.2 on a lab-router (Ubiquiti Edgerouter, MIPS
> platform) and RPKI.
>
> In my attempts to examine ROA tables more
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 06:21:15AM +, bbk bbk wrote:
> hi,
>
> Can the bird add two BFD sessions with same destination ip and different
> local ip?
>
> My testing is only one session can be added as if.
Hi
AFAIK it cannot, sessions are identified just by remote ip.
--
Elen sila lumenn'
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 08:31:09PM -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> Is it possible to (re)export unreachable routes via BGP?
>
> All attempts thus far have resulted in the BGP neighbor session with the 3rd
> test machine not (re)exporting any unreachable routes. I can (re)export
> other routes
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 07:16:55PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I know, it is not possible to transform BGP routes (with gateway)
> into device routes in the bird itself. But may be somebody else knows the
> trick.
Hi
Yes, BIRD filters allow to set IP address of nexthop,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 10:42:27AM +0200, Semion Lisyansky wrote:
> Thanks, Alexander
>
> Using bird 2.0.2. Guess it does not include patch you mentioned
>
> Have another question:
> Configured peers in vrf with different addresses but still in overlapping
> subnets.
> BGP session are
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 08:37:38PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I specify relative log file path, the file is created relative to the
> current working directory. But for the include directive relative path are
> applied relative to the config file. Probably it would be better to
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 08:38:28PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for improving the patch.
>
> Did I get it right? You mean the case when one has the same IP for BGP
> sessions in different VRFs on different interfaces?
Unless 'strict bind' option is used, local IP is
-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
commit e19d08055a4614f03e51ee72617be10946ce7919
Author: Ondrej Zajicek (work)
Date: Fri Oct 26 19:11:33 2018 +0200
BGP: Fix VRF for listening socket
Listeni
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:05:10PM +0200, Alexander Velkov wrote:
> Hello bird-team,
> I have a bird v1.6.4. configuration that works fine.
> A certain set of actions leads to a segfault and a crash of the bird binary.
Hi
Thanks for the elaborate bugreport, i can reproduce the bug the attached
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:39:59AM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Last but not least. I have found a undocumented function 'format()'. This
> > function seems to return a string and shell patterns work. I guess the
> > function should not be used in production so I just u
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:55:45AM +, Hombach, Tobias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible in current BIRD 2.0.2 release to filter (more dynamically)
> VPNv4 prefixes based on RD? In our scenario, we want to use BIRD to connect
> large VPNv4 landscapes and want to filter prefixes based on RD on
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 02:56:49PM +0300, oldnick wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am observing strange BGP announcement problem.
Hi
It is a race condition when an export filter is changed and a route is
removed (during to change in import filter). See:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 02:03:16PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> The configure.ac script initializes the CLIENT variable this way:
>
> CLIENT=birdcl
> if client enabled
> CLIENT=$CLIENT birdc
> fi
>
> This means that checking if @CLIENT@ is empty to decide whether birdc
> should be installed
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 04:07:01PM +0200, Piotr Marciniak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’ve spent some time trying to find any option to make our border BGP router
> to announce itself as defaul router by OSPF to our network switches. No luck.
>
> This discussion was rised fe. 5 years ago but with no
Hi
Forwarding a mail about source ports of BFD on Linux.
- Forwarded message from "SHAW, JASON via RT"
-
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:37:05 +0200
Subject: BFD on Linux
From: "SHAW, JASON via RT"
Hi.
We're using Bird 2.0 for a project here at AT and I wanted to reach out
and let you
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:43:02AM -0300, heisenbug at xpto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to check, I tried on a lab environment with Cisco devices, using
> the same topology/idea, two eBGP with rs client capability passing
> through an iBGP do not prepend AS on AS-PATH.
Yes, your patch should work
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 02:21:42PM -0300, heisenbug at xpto wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> On bird1.6, I have deployed our Route Servers using the below
> architecture to split the load from the control plane:
>
> Customer1 <-> RS1[pid0] <-> iBGP <-> RS2[pid1] <-> Customer2
>
> And is working fine as
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:58:41AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> So the preference value in BIRD is not the same as administrative
> distance? I believe both Juniper and Cisco treats lower preference
> value / administrative distance value as a more preferred route.
>
>
>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:51:17AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The primary route in BIRD, marked by '*', confuses me. Consider the
> following two default routes as displayed by BIRD (2.0.2) and the Linux
> kernel (4.14.51+).
>
> bird> show route
> Table master4:
> 0.0.0.0/0
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:34:03PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Looks broken in 2.0.2. Can you retest on 2.0.2 as well?
>
> You are right, it is broken on 2.0.2, it is fixed by patch:
>
> 586c1800c447ff099d34889b23647c4733876d9b
> Nest: Neighbor cache cleanups
So
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 03:08:19PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> >
> > So there are no log messages when interface is created and enabled?
>
> No I did not see any more logs. Maybe I need to enable more logs? This
> was my log config;
>
> log "/tmp/bird.log" all;
> protocol device {debug all;
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:14:35PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 14:27 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> > not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
> >
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:38:56AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using BIRD 2.0.2 and have trouble with static routes that gets stuck in
> dormant state. It looks as the problem happens if the static route is pushed
> into BIRD config before the interface exists. BIRD detects when
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:05:25PM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Ok. This is because unnecessary and undesirable sanity check that same
> peerIP cannot exist twice.
Hi
You are right, there is a lock to avoid run two instances for the same
neighbor. Although the primary reason for this lock is to
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 01:07:15PM -0500, Joshua J wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I was wondering what the team was doing to support routing table dumps.
> I see the PR
> https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/commit/6702b7ad7417bf52ab35102061919b1161204076
Hi
I am currently finishing a new MRT dumping
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:43:47AM -0300, heisenbug at xpto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use logical operators like OR and AND on bgpmask filter,
> but I'm not able, Can you please check if the syntax ir wrong or if is
> possible to do what I expect to do? The data from output is sanitized.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:33:38PM +, gerta toli wrote:
> I understand what you are saying but they are insisting that they router
> doesnt support 4byte ASN. Im not sure what the router and the version they
> are using.
You can catch the session establishment attempt using tcpdump tool to
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 07:57:43AM +, gerta toli wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Does anyone know or test the AS_Trans 23456 with Bird? We are using
> Bird and our ASN is 4 byte, but the peer supports only 2bytes ASN. I told
> them to use the AS23456 to peer with me, but it seems Bird doesnt
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 09:54:19AM +0200, Kevin Schmitz wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> i tried to announce routes via ospf first time. Till now i use babel to
> get my routes in my table. Now i want to announce the babel routes
> trough my ospf as well.
>
> But here i see, even if import and export
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:58:08PM +0200, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> Hello -
>
> the manual explains a global protocol option:
>
> description "text"
> This is an optional description of the protocol. It is displayed as a part of
> the output of 'show route all' command.
Hello
It should be
801 - 900 of 1397 matches
Mail list logo
