I was a curious about the purpose of ‘igp_metric’ attribute while investigating
this. It seems to only be used as a generic container attribute in route.h. Is
there a reason that property is not exposed?
Maybe ‘igp_cost’? :)
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 15:10, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 02:56:21PM -0500, Corban Johnson wrote:
> > If you want, i can send you patch to fix
> > that.
>
> That would be very helpful, thank you :)
Attached (untested).
It adds read-only integer property nh_cost to access that.
The name of the property is horrible (that is why
> If you want, i can send you patch to fix
> that.
That would be very helpful, thank you :)
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 14:53, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:54:57PM -0500, Corban Johnson wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I am trying to set MED on a BGP route using the metric value from
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:54:57PM -0500, Corban Johnson wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to set MED on a BGP route using the metric value from OSPF, but
> the attributes of the next-hop route do not seem to be available in filter
> evolution. Am I missing something?
>
> The problem seems to be
Hello,
I am trying to set MED on a BGP route using the metric value from OSPF, but the
attributes of the next-hop route do not seem to be available in filter
evolution. Am I missing something?
Example Bird 2.0 config:
protocol bgp test_peer {
bfd on;
med
