RE: Received route with strange next-hop

2019-05-28 Thread Adrichem, N.L.M. (Niels) van
ej Zajicek Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 5:43 PM To: Adrichem, N.L.M. (Niels) van Cc: bird-users@network.cz Subject: Re: Received route with strange next-hop On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:09:34AM +, Adrichem, N.L.M. (Niels) van wrote: > Hello, > > Additionally, the bird.log file throws

Re: Received route with strange next-hop

2019-05-16 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:09:34AM +, Adrichem, N.L.M. (Niels) van wrote: > Hello, > > Additionally, the bird.log file throws the following error: > 2019-05-15 10:27:21.869 Started > 2019-05-15 10:27:21.902 Missing broadcast address for interface vxlan0 > 2019-05-15 10:27:29.329 KRT:

Received route with strange next-hop

2019-05-15 Thread Adrichem, N.L.M. (Niels) van
Hello, I'm trying to redistribute routes from another routing daemon through synchronization of the kernel table using the kernel protocol in BIRD 2.0.4. However, I run into some problems that not all routes are imported by the BIRD router. The kernel routing table contains the following

Re: KRT: Received route with strange next-hop

2015-12-05 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:16:54PM -0500, Brian Rak wrote: > >Sorry for late answer, 'device route' i call a route for directly > >attached network prefix, with associated iface but without associated > >gateway IP. Perhaps there is a better / more established term for such > >routes. > > > Sorry,

Re: KRT: Received route with strange next-hop

2015-11-25 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:25:01AM -0500, Brian Rak wrote: > >Generally, BIRD expects that the next hop address is reachable by > >interface address prefix. In your case you just add device route for > >45.63.4.188/32 instead of adding peer address of 45.63.4.188 to veth0. It > >is true that for