Greetings,
a thought occurred to me that I would love to hear what some bitcoin experts
think about.
What if one were to adjust the difficulty (for individual blocks) depending on
the relative size to the average block size of the previous difficulty period?
(I apologize if i’m not using the
Like this?
https://gist.github.com/gubatron/143e431ee01158f27db4
http://twitter.com/gubatron
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Jakob Rönnbäck
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Greetings,
a thought occurred to me that I would love to hear what some bitcoin
experts think about.
Hmm… well, yes and no. Mostly no :)
The main idea i was trying to describe was that the actual difficulty for the
block could be adjusted according to how much the size of the proposed block
differ compared to the average size of blocks in the previous difficulty
period. Unless I’m being very
On 14 August 2015 at 16:48, Jakob Rönnbäck
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
14 aug 2015 kl. 16:20 skrev Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au:
On 14 August 2015 at 11:59, Jakob Rönnbäck
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
What if one were to adjust the difficulty (for
Ah, there we go. I should have dug deeper into the mailing list
Thanks
/jakob
14 aug 2015 kl. 17:03 skrev Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org:
There is a proposal that relates to this, see the flexcap proposal by
Greg Maxwell Mark Friedenbach, it was discussed on the list back in
May:
On 08/14/15 00:47, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Joseph Poon via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
I haven't tested the details of this, but is there another bit available
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Jorge Timón jti...@jtimon.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Venzen Khaosan ven...@mail.bihthai.net
wrote:
4) General, undefined fear that something bad is going to happen when
nodes choke up on a backlog of transactions.
- - no specific symptoms are
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Venzen Khaosan ven...@mail.bihthai.net
wrote:
On 08/12/2015 10:35 AM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev wrote:
It depends on which use case's reliability that you focus on. For
any specific use case of Bitcoin, that use case will be more
reliable with a larger
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Geir Harald Hansen via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
So in summary:
- Bitcoin dies. The end.
I believe this is included in btc exchange rate may fall.
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Elliot Olds elliot.o...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Jorge Timón
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
I believe all concerns I've read can be classified in the following
groups:
1) Potential indirect consequence of rising fees.
Nobody mentioned exchange rates. Those matter to miners too.
Does it make sense for George Soros and every other rich person /
institution to have the power to move difficulty, even pin it to min or
max, just by buying or selling piles of BTC to swing the exchange rate?
On 8/14/2015 8:03 AM,
To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on
each side to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.
The resulting lists may not have any practical value but I'm going to
maintain them locally nonetheless. If that's is not useful for the
participants they can just leave
Any idea what's going on with TestNet? No blocks for nearly 2 hours now,
according to multiple block explorers (blockr.io, my own bitcoin node, etc).
Prior to the last block (530516), there were a lot of blocks with zero
transactions and only an occasional block with a ton of txs.
Any info?
13 matches
Mail list logo
