Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated Witness BIPs

2016-01-04 Thread jl2012 via bitcoin-dev
A new BIP, as part of the SW softfork, is pending BIP number assignment: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/270 This proposal defines a new transaction digest algorithm for signature verification in version 0 and version 1 witness program, in order to minimize redundant data hashing in verif

Re: [bitcoin-dev] An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork.

2016-01-04 Thread joe2015--- via bitcoin-dev
On 2016-01-05 02:04, Nick ODell wrote: How are you collecting fees from the transactions in the block? Probably the simplest way to do this is to map the new-rules coinbase tx (which collects the block reward and fees) into an old-rules legacy coinbase tx (which collects the block reward only

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork.

2016-01-04 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
On Sunday, December 20, 2015 10:56:33 AM joe2015--- via bitcoin-dev wrote: > "generalized" softfork. FWIW, this is something I've been planning to proposed (in a nicer form) for a while, tentatively called a "soft hardfork" (or less-seriously a "softserve hardfork"). The big piece missing that I

Re: [bitcoin-dev] An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork.

2016-01-04 Thread Nick ODell via bitcoin-dev
How are you collecting fees from the transactions in the block? On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 8:51 PM, joe2015--- via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On 2016-01-03 02:46, Marco Falke wrote: >> >> 2015-12-30 17:27 GMT+01:00 : >>> >>> On 2015-12-30 18:33, Marco Falke wrote: This is an interesting app