On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Why not use the single-show-signature scheme I came up with a while
> back on the Bitcoin side to force the bitcoin side to reveal a private
> key?
>
>
>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> That is very interesting.
>
> There has been some recent discussion about atomic cross chain transfers
> between Bitcoin and legacy altcoins. For this purpose a legacy altcoin is
> one
That is very interesting.
There has been some recent discussion about atomic cross chain transfers
between Bitcoin and legacy altcoins. For this purpose a legacy altcoin is
one that has strict IsStandard() rules and none of the advanced script
opcodes.
It has a requirement that Bob sends Alice
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner
wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> It a property of the SKCP system that the person who performed the trusted
> setup cannot extract any information from a proof?
>
> In other words, is it proven hard to obtain
Congratulations!
It a property of the SKCP system that the person who performed the trusted
setup cannot extract any information from a proof?
In other words, is it proven hard to obtain information from a proof by the
buyer?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
I am happy to announce the first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent
Payment (ZKCP) on the Bitcoin network.
ZKCP is a transaction protocol that allows a buyer to purchase
information from a seller using Bitcoin in a manner which is private,
scalable, secure, and which doesn’t require trusting
At the 3rd Bitcoin Workshop being held in conjunction with the Financial
Cryptography Conference in Barbados, my group will be presenting a new idea
for improving Bitcoin wallet security and deterring thefts today.
The write-up is here: