Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers

2017-03-21 Thread Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Reposting this response since this made it neither to distribution nor to the moderation archive. - Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:59:42 -0800 From: Eric Voskuil

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A BIP proposal for segwit addresses

2017-03-21 Thread Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Why use Base 32 when the QR code alphanumeric mode allows 44 characters? > In Bitcoin Wallet, I use Base 43 (alphabet: > "0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ$*+-./:") for most efficient QR > code encoding. I

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A BIP proposal for segwit addresses

2017-03-21 Thread Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev
Why use Base 32 when the QR code alphanumeric mode allows 44 characters? In Bitcoin Wallet, I use Base 43 (alphabet: "0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ$*+-./:") for most efficient QR code encoding. I only leave out the space character because it gets replaced by "+" in URLs. On 03/20/2017

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Inquiry: Transaction Tiering

2017-03-21 Thread Tim Ruffing via bitcoin-dev
(I'm not a lawyer...) I'm not sure if I can make sense of your email. On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 20:12 +, Martin Stolze via bitcoin-dev wrote: > As a participant in the economy in general and of Bitcoin in > particular, I desire an ability to decide where I transact. The > current state of