Scriptsig not "sigscript" below
Now you must answer this question, because this is what we call a hard fork
Le 22/12/2017 à 11:29, Aymeric Vitte a écrit :
>
> Le 22/12/2017 à 00:09, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev a écrit :
>> What is actually done, is using the signature + message to perform key
Hi Damian,
Thought I'd chip in. This is a hard fork scenario. This system has flaws,
they all do.
If you had a fixed fee per block, so that every txn in that block paid the
same fee, that might make it easier to include all txns eventually, as you
envisage.
The fee could be calculated as the
If the cash value of Bitcoin was high enough and zero fee transactions were
never accepted and not counted when calculating the transaction pool size then
I do not think it would be such an issue. Why is it even possible to create
zero fee transactions?
Regards,
Damian Williamson
Hello,
I'm not a bitcoin developer, but I'd like to receive feedback on what
I think is a serious problem. Hope I'm not wasting your time.
I'm also sure this was already discussed, but google doesn't give me
any good result.
Let me explain: I think that the current incentive system doesn't
really
