Re: [bitcoin-dev] Built in encryption

2018-02-19 Thread Lucas Clemente Vella via bitcoin-dev
Theoretically, if the recipient address had already disclosed the public key (i.e. already spent from that address), or shared it with you instead of (or alongside with) the address, then you can use recipient's ECDSA key to encrypt the message with ECC, as both ECDSA and ECC share the same kind of

[bitcoin-dev] Built in encryption

2018-02-19 Thread Ilan Oh via bitcoin-dev
Hey guys, Features info, I know we can add text to a btc transaction and it is pretty easy, However is it possible to encrypt the data in a way that only the receiver would be able to read it in clear. And of course without having to exchange info off the network. And if not possible on bitcoin

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Some thoughts on removing timestamps in PoW

2018-02-19 Thread Daniele Pinna via bitcoin-dev
Granted that removing the 21M coin cap is basically a non-starter in de bitcoin community I'd like to respond to a couple points in your proposal. The Y% difficulty adjustment should still be calculated through some averaging of a certain number N of past blocks. Otherwise two lucky high difficult

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Some thoughts on removing timestamps in PoW

2018-02-19 Thread Damian Williamson via bitcoin-dev
>1. Introducing state checkpoints into the chain itself could make it possible >for full nodes to skip verification of large sections of historical data when >booting up. What you are suggesting, unless I am mistaken, is that new full nodes should have no way of knowing if an output is spent o