OK.
Thank you guys for clarification.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying!
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:48 PM, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> > Good morning Karl-Johan Alm,
> >
> > To clarify:
> >
> > Nothin
Good morning Karl-Johan Alm,
To clarify:
Nothing prevents a miner from completely ignoring nSequence when putting
transactions in blocks.
Unconfirmed transactions are, by definition, not recorded in blocks. So if
there is a transaction 0xFFF nSequence and fee 1000 satoshi, and another
co
Thanks for clarifying!
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:48 PM, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning Karl-Johan Alm,
>
> To clarify:
>
> Nothing prevents a miner from completely ignoring nSequence when putting
> transactions in blocks.
>
> Unconfirmed transactions are, by definition, not recorded in blocks.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 05:10:43PM +0900, Karl-Johan Alm wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> > Or via full replace-by-fee, which appears to be used by a significant
> > minority
> > of miners:
>
> I was of the impression that final transactions (sequence=0x)
> c
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> Or via full replace-by-fee, which appears to be used by a significant minority
> of miners:
I was of the impression that final transactions (sequence=0x)
cannot be RBF'd.
___
bitcoin-dev maili
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:22:42PM +0900, Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Clarification on one part below:
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Karl-Johan Alm
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Maksim Solovjov via bitcoin-dev
> > wrote:
> >> 1. What does it mean for a transact