Re: [bitcoin-dev] Multiparty signatures

2018-07-11 Thread Adam Back via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018, 02:42 Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Basically you're just replacing addition with interpolation everywhere in the musig construction Yes, but you can't do that without a delinearization mechanism to prevent adaptive public key

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] BIP sighash_noinput

2018-07-11 Thread ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
Good morning DING FENG, While your concern is valid, the general intent is the below: 1. We will use a scary name like SIGHASH_NOINPUT_UNSAFE to explicitly inform to wallet and Bitcoin software developers that the flag is potentially unsafe. 2. SIGHASH_NOINPUT_UNSAFE is intended to be used for

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Multiparty signatures

2018-07-11 Thread Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
OK, so you're going with this scenario: 1. I know Apub and Bpub, 2. I know M is 3 3. I'm choosing a random number for C's private key Cpub is g^C The equation I am solving for .. and trying to factor myself out of is g^Ax + g^B*2 + g^C*3 I don't know A or B... I only know their public keys. I

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 174 thoughts

2018-07-11 Thread Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:10 AM, matejcik wrote: > On 6.7.2018 00:06, Pieter Wuille wrote:> The only case where "malicious" > conflicting values can occur is when >> one of the Signers produces an invalid signature, or modifies any of >> the other fields already present in the PSBT for consumption

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 174 thoughts

2018-07-11 Thread Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I don't think that's a particularly useful policy, but certainly > Signers are allowed to implement any policy they like about what they > accept in signing. Do we really want the specification to permit conforming implementa

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly IRC Meeting Time Poll

2018-07-11 Thread Cory Fields via bitcoin-dev
Hi Simon The poll is intended for regular Bitcoin Core contributors, who meet once a week to discuss what they're working on. It is a mundane software meeting, unrelated to the research and discussion of Bitcoin itself. The meetings are open to all, but it makes sense to constrain scheduling decis

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 174 thoughts on graphics

2018-07-11 Thread vv01f via bitcoin-dev
this is intended to fix the graphics * as not scaleable bitmap/png * with broken capitalization * not easy editable plaintext for git have a view[1] on the suggestion for an example[0]. [0]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0174/coinjoin-workflow.png [1]: https://de.sharelatex.co