Hi Chris,
yes, fidelity bonds can impose cost to make sybill attacks more expensive
therefore less likely.
I prefer the flavor with CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY which imposes opportunity cost,
just as effective
as burning, but is sustainable.
Imposing opportunity costs however requires larger time locke
Hi Justus,
It might be helpful to consult the Rust implementation of BIP158 here:
https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/blob/master/src/util/bip158.rs
It has a cleaner structure than Core or Neutrino, includes server and client
side
and passes Core's test vectors.
Regards,
Tamas Blumme
