Hello ZmnSCPxj,
On 30/04/2020 09:54, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning CB,
>
>
>> Equal-output-coinjoins and JoinMarket also have a version of the
>> common-input-ownership-heuristic (CIOH), because its often possible to
>> separate the inputs into sets of their owners of a equal-output-coinjoin
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0069.mediawiki
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol "stick" Rusnak
CTO, SatoshiLabs
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 10:21 SatoshiSingh via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi list. I've been a lurker for quite sometime and this
Good morning CB,
> Equal-output-coinjoins and JoinMarket also have a version of the
> common-input-ownership-heuristic (CIOH), because its often possible to
> separate the inputs into sets of their owners of a equal-output-coinjoin
> using the input amounts. CoinSwap can be combined with
Hi everyone,
In the current draft of BIP-0341 [1] the signature message commits to the
scriptPubKey of the output being spent by the input. I propose that the
signature message should commit to the scriptPubKeys of *all* transaction
inputs.
In certain applications like CoinJoin, a wallet has to
Hi list. I've been a lurker for quite sometime and this is my first post.
The problem I'm addressing is that generally wallet devs construct the tx with
the 2nd output being of the sender as change. This helps chain analysers to
identity addresses and invade the users privacy.
I'm suggesting
