Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK. p. On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:09 AM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to > assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo. > > Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP e

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK adding Kalle. On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:36 AM Jeremy via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > ACK adding Kalle. > > Kalle is a qualified reviewer / editor and well suited for this role. > -- > @JeremyRubin >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK. Kalle has been exceptional throughout his contributions — especially thankful for btcdeb 🙏 On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 3:51 AM Pindar Wong via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > ACK. > > p. > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:09 AM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-d

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] L2s Onchain Support IRC Workshop

I'd be excited to join. Recommend bumping the date to mid June, if that's ok, as many Americans will be at Bitcoin 2021. I was thinking about reviving the sponsors proposal with a 100 block lock on spending a sponsoring tx which would hopefully make less controversial, this would be a great place

[bitcoin-dev] L2s Onchain Support IRC Workshop

Hi, During the lastest years, tx-relay and mempool acceptances rules of the base layer have been sources of major security and operational concerns for Lightning and other Bitcoin second-layers [0]. I think those areas require significant improvements to ease design and deployment of higher Bitcoi

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] L2s Onchain Support IRC Workshop

Hi Jeremy, Yes dates are floating for now. After Bitcoin 2021, sounds a good idea. Awesome, I'll be really interested to review again an improved version of sponsorship. And I'll try to sketch out the sighash_no-input fee-bumping idea which was floating around last year during pinnings discussion

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

Hi Luke, For the records and the subscribers of this list not following #bitcoin-core-dev, this mail follows a discussion which did happen during yesterday irc meetings. Logs here : http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-04-22.log I'll reiterate my opinion expressed during the meeting. If this p

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] L2s Onchain Support IRC Workshop

Great idea, I'll join as well. Thanks for setting this in motion. Le ven. 23 avr. 2021 à 17:39, Antoine Riard a écrit : > Hi Jeremy, > > Yes dates are floating for now. After Bitcoin 2021, sounds a good idea. > > Awesome, I'll be really interested to review again an improved version of > sponsor

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Pre-BIP] Motivating Address type for OP_RETURN

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 08:46:07AM -0700, Jeremy via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Script is technically "too wide" a type as what I really want is to > only return coins with known output types. I don't understand this concern. If script is too wide a type, then OP_RETURN being a scriptPubKey of arbitrar