Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

2021-04-25 Thread David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 04:42:12AM +, Greg Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I am opposed to the addition of Kalle Alm at this time. Those who > believe [this] will resolve the situation [...] re: PR1104 are > mistaken. PR1104 has been merged. Do you continue to oppose the addition? Thanks,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs

2021-04-25 Thread Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
Alright, let's see... Sorting by most recently updated... https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pulls?page=1&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-asc+updated%3A%3E2021-01-01 #1104 has been updated nearly daily for the past many weeks. You commented 12 days ago saying "Concept NACK" (which isn't a thing

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs

2021-04-25 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
On Sunday 25 April 2021 21:14:08 Matt Corallo wrote: > On 4/25/21 17:00, Luke Dashjr wrote: > > I will not become an accomplice to this deception by giving special > > treatment, and will process the BIP PR neutrally according to the > > currently-defined BIP process. > > Again, please don't play d

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs

2021-04-25 Thread Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
On 4/25/21 17:00, Luke Dashjr wrote: On Sunday 25 April 2021 20:29:44 Matt Corallo wrote: If the BIP editor is deliberately refusing to accept changes which the author's approval (which appears to be occurring here), It isn't. I am triaging BIPs PRs the same as I have for years, and will get t

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs

2021-04-25 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
On Sunday 25 April 2021 20:29:44 Matt Corallo wrote: > If the BIP editor is deliberately refusing to accept changes which the > author's approval (which appears to be occurring here), It isn't. I am triaging BIPs PRs the same as I have for years, and will get to them all in due time, likely befor

[bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs

2021-04-25 Thread Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
There appears to be some severe lack of understanding of the point of the BIP process here. The BIP process exists to be a place for those in the Bitcoin development community (which includes anyone who wishes to participate in it!) to place specifications which may be important for others in t

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPs - notarization protocol and decentralized storage

2021-04-25 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
On Wednesday 21 April 2021 04:26:26 Prayank via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Also since this involves LN, maybe it can just be a LN project instead of > BIP? Not the best person to comment on what can be a BIP. Anything that Bitcoin software would benefit in collaboration with other projects on qualifies