Hi Antoine,
Thanks for initiating this! I'm interested in joining. Since I mostly live
in L1, my primary goal is to understand what simplest version of package
relay would be sufficient to support transaction relay assumptions made by
L2 applications. For example, if a parent + child package cover
I endorse Harding's recommendations. On the point about mirroring,
one thing to keep in mind is that the other repositories may go
offline.
Modification confusion could be avoided by recording what revision
(commit hash) was current at the time of inclusion, but the document
going offline can onl
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 05:31:50PM -0400, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> In general, I think its time we all agree the BIP process has simply failed
> and move on. Luckily its not really all that critical and proposed protocol
> documents can be placed nearly anywhere with the same effect.
On Friday, April 23rd, 2021 at 4:09 AM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to
> assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.
ACK on adding Kalle.
I'm happy to finally see someone else interested in BIP maintainer role,
ACK for Kalle.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 09:55 Sjors Provoost via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> ACK for adding Kalle.
>
> Recent drama aside, having a single editor is not ideal. There's currently
> 110 open pull requests to the BIPs repo.
>
> - Sjors
>
> > Op 23 apr.
ACK for adding Kalle.
Recent drama aside, having a single editor is not ideal. There's currently 110
open pull requests to the BIPs repo.
- Sjors
> Op 23 apr. 2021, om 04:09 heeft Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Al
