Hi Erik
Please correct me if I misunderstood.
> email is fully compromised.
What I got is:
Email is not good because the sender and receiver are compromised.
Email is not good because the message content is revealed.
I can claim same argue about any other client/server model. Since the
server
your protocol should always assume the email system is fully
compromised, and only send public information over email:
- public keys / addresses are sent
- other routing data encrypted with public keys (not sure how data is
routed in sabu)
your end user should be able to verify public keys / add
Hi Billy,
Sorry for late reply. Let’s jump in proposal.
> Some more information about the benefits of this approach vs alternatives
> (mainly lightning)
The most important different is unlike the lightning, in Sabu no one
have to open a channel and pay Bitcoin transaction fee, subsequently no
one
