Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Removing the Dust Limit

2021-08-19 Thread Jeremy via bitcoin-dev
one interesting point that came up at the bitdevs in austin today that favors remove that i believe is new to this discussion (it was new to me): the argument can be reduced to: - dust limit is a per-node relay policy. - it is rational for miners to mine dust outputs given their cost of

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-19 Thread Karl via bitcoin-dev
Something that could work really well here could be having a norm of using the checksum for bright colors, weights, sizes, capitalizations, and/or spacing of the characters of the address, making different addresses more clearly visually distinct. Ethereum uses mixed case to do this a little bit:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-19 Thread Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
As an alternative, you might want to consider LifeHash, which includes a visual indicator as well as a readable fingerprint value. LifeHash is an open source visual hashing algorithm that we use for all our projects. Lifehash has a number of desirable qualities, including high complexity, good

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-19 Thread ts via bitcoin-dev
Hello ZmnSCPxj, ZmnSCPxj wrote on 8/16/21 5:34 AM: Good morning TS, Entering a BTC address for a transaction can pose a risk of error (human or technical). While there is a checksum integrated in BTC addresses already, this is used only at a technical level and does not avoid entering a