> Hmm, I'm reading C5 as "If an oracle says X, and Alice and Carol agree,
> they can distribute all the remaining funds as they see fit".
Should be read as an OR:
IF 2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
ELSE 2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
ENDIF
<> 2 IN_OUT_AMOUNT
The empty vector is a wildca
Great, thanks for this clarification!
Can you confirm that this won't be an issue either with your
example 2C (in your first set of diagrams)? If I understand it
correctly it shouldn't, but I'd rather be 100% sure.
A package A + C will be able to replace A' + B regardless of
the weight of A' + B?
Hi Bastien,
> A package A + C will be able to replace A' + B regardless of
> the weight of A' + B?
Correct, the weight of A' + B will not prevent A+C from replacing it (as
long as A+C pays enough fees). In example 2C, we would be able to replace A
with a package.
Best,
Gloria
On Wed, Sep 22, 20
Hi AJ,
Happy to see that this proposal has finally seen the light of day! I've been
hearing about it in hinted background convos over the past few months, so
happy I can finally dig into the specifics of its operation.
> So the idea is to do just that via a new opcode "TAPLEAF_UPDATE_VERIFY"
> (T
