With respect to the disagreement/misunderstanding about the "<1vMB in the
mempool" case, I think it's important to be clear about what the goals of
relay policy are. Should the goal be to only relay transactions that
increase miner revenue? Sure ideally, because we want to minimize load on
the net
> in the case of a multisig/non-consensus based system, exit from that
restriction is still possible
But why do we care if someone reduces the value of coins they own by
permanently encumbering them in some way? Burning coins permanently
encumbers them so much they can't be spent at all. If the wo
> Such a construct would present dangerous implications to the fungibility of
> individual UTXOs by introducing a totally different risk model in being paid
> with such a coin compared to any other coin not encumbered by such a condition
How is that different from being paid in an altcoin?
It se
