On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 03:06:43AM +, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > > They're radically different approaches and
> > > it's hard to see how they mix. Everything in lisp is completely sandboxed,
> > > and that functionality is important to a lot of things, and it's really
> > > normal to
On Friday 11 March 2022 00:12:19 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> The "no-miner-veto" concerns are, to an extent, addressed by the short
> timeline of Speedy Trial. No more waiting 2 years on the miners dragging
> their feet.
It's still a miner veto. The only way this works is if the
On Thu., Mar. 10, 2022, 08:04 Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev, <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> You're right, we shouldn't get personal. We shouldn't ignore feedback from
> me, mark friedenbach or luke just because of who it comes from.
>
For goodness sake Jorge, enough with the
Hi James,
> I don't really see the vaults case as any different from other
> sufficiently involved uses of bitcoin script - I don't remember anyone
> raising these concerns for lightning scripts or DLCs or tapscript use,
> any of which could be catastrophic if wallet implementations are not
>
Hi Zeeman,
> Have not looked at the actual vault design, but I observe that Taproot
allows for a master key (which can be an n-of-n, or a k-of-n with setup
(either expensive or trusted, but I repeat myself)) to back out of any
contract.
>
> This master key could be an "even colder" key that you
Thank you for explaining. I agree with luke then, I'm against speedy trial.
I explained why already, I think.
In summary: speedy trial kind of means is miners and not users who decide
the rules.
It gives users less opportunities to react and oppose a malevolent change
in case miners want to impose
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022, 14:14 Michael Folkson
wrote:
> Hi Jorge
>
> > Since this has meetings like taproot, it seems it's going to end up
> being added in bitcoin core no matter what.
>
> Anyone can set up a IRC channel, anyone can organize a IRC meeting, anyone
> can announce meetings on the
> There is no coin control in Wasabi Wallet 2.
This is correct, but in and of itself can be misleading for those who know
that privacy in Bitcoin is near impossible without coin control, because
the conclusion would be then that Wasabi 2.0 ruined privacy for no reason,
which is obviously not the
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
> Just ask a bunch of fullnodes to add this 1Mb of extra ignored data in
this tiny 1-input-1-output transaction so I pay only a small fee
I'm not suggesting that you wouldn't have to pay a fee for it. You'd pay a
fee for it as normal, so there's no DOS vector. Doesn't adding
extra
