Re: [bitcoin-dev] Announcement: Full-RBF Miner Bounty

2022-12-09 Thread Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 05:04:05PM +0100, 0xB10C via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hi AJ and list, > > > This seems to be pretty good evidence that we currently don't have any > > significant hashrate mining with fullrbf policies (<0.5% if there was a > > high fee replacement available prior to every block

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Announcement: Full-RBF Miner Bounty

2022-12-09 Thread 0xB10C via bitcoin-dev
Hi AJ and list, > This seems to be pretty good evidence that we currently don't have any > significant hashrate mining with fullrbf policies (<0.5% if there was a > high fee replacement available prior to every block having been mined), > despite the bounty having been collected. For further moni

[bitcoin-dev] [Opt-in full-RBF] Zero-conf apps in immediate danger (angus)

2022-12-09 Thread angus via bitcoin-dev
I think the fundamental disagreement here that's causing the controversy and impasse is this: Those in favour of Full RBF see trusting and relying on predictable mempool policy as a fundamentally flawed bad idea. Node policy is not a consensus rule - a miner has always been allowed to produce