Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits

2023-01-27 Thread Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
Le 27/01/2023 à 14:21, Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev a écrit : > if people were storing NFTs and other crap on the > chain, then the Bitcoin fee market would become entangled with random > pump&dump markets So you mean that Bitcoin is out for NFTs, Metaverse and "web3"? LN is good but I don't

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ephemeral Anchors: Fixing V3 Package RBF againstpackage limit pinning

2023-01-27 Thread Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
Hello again dev, Due to the interest in the proposal and the prodding of certain folks, I've written up a short draft BIP of the Ephemeral Anchors idea here: https://github.com/instagibbs/bips/blob/ephemeral_anchor/bip-ephemeralanchors.mediawiki The pull request at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitc

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits

2023-01-27 Thread Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 09:44:10AM -0300, Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I'm curious what opinions exist and what actions might be taken by core > developers regarding storing unlimited amounts of NFT (or other?) content > as witness data (https://docs.ordinals.com/inscriptions.html). T

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits

2023-01-27 Thread rot13maxi via bitcoin-dev
Hello, “Unlimited storage” isn’t really accurate. It’s witness data in a taproot transaction, so the block size limit still applies. Anyone who runs an unpruned bitcoin node should be capacity-planning their disk space assuming that in the future blocks will be more full - as demand for blocksp

[bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits

2023-01-27 Thread Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev
I'm curious what opinions exist and what actions might be taken by core developers regarding storing unlimited amounts of NFT (or other?) content as witness data (https://docs.ordinals.com/inscriptions.html). The ordinal scheme is elegant and genius IMHO, but when I think about the future disk use