Re: [bitcoin-dev] Refreshed BIP324

2023-02-28 Thread Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
you can always do what protocols usually do. 1 byte is fine for now, but reserve the top bit for "this is a two byte id" (128 choices). then when you run out of room, set the top bit which means "this is a 2 byte id (again with one reserved) and so-on. ie: how protobuf stores integers. On Tu

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Refreshed BIP324

2023-02-28 Thread Dhruv M via bitcoin-dev
The relevant changes from this discussion about short 1-byte message type IDs are now in a PR for the bips repo: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1428 On 2/21/23 08:03, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 03:22:30PM +, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> On S

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Fee-redistribution contracts

2023-02-28 Thread shymaa arafat via bitcoin-dev
If you allow me to comment (just with a bird eye, have not read the paper only the abstract) I think the Bitcoin community may consider the intuition of somewhat "Future Saving" through TX fees: ie, the idea of saving a ratio of the fees (say half to be decreased to half with each reward halving)i