I have been meaning to respond to this thread earlier, but better late than
never.
"want bitcoin to be money and money means different things for people in this
world”
The definition of money is very subjective; when I began my involvement with
this project in Late 2010. It was a lot closer to
i think the w3c is a very good example of a slow train wreck, and we should
do everything possible to avoid the decisions they made
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 7:09 AM Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Personnally I will never criticize the maintainers, b
Personnally I will never criticize the maintainers, but my comment was
about the global process, I thought that for something important like
bitcoin there were many devs/maintainers, and as you point out, a PR
must be done by certified people
I don't get very well why every company involved in bit
Thanks for this Andrew.
> What commentary does there need to be?
There doesn't "need" to be explanations about anything. There doesn't "need" to
be any review comments whatsoever from anybody. But a world where reviewers
explain what they've done to satisfy themselves that a pull request is rea
Hi AJ
> Competition is the only answer to concerns about the bad effects from a
> monopoly.
Well one can first make suggestions and requests to the monopoly and see if the
monopoly is open to them. In the case of bitcoin-inquisition/default signet I
like the idea of a group who are interested
