Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes?

2023-05-10 Thread Weiji Guo via bitcoin-dev
> I would like to point out that I'm not an advocate for doing anything at this point aside from working on l2 Speaking of L2, I had recently proposed a new opcode OP_ZKP to enable payments based on ZKP proof. I wonder if it has drawn enough attention but it seems to me a viable way to address

Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee

2023-05-10 Thread vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
> possible to change tx "max fee" to output amounts? Is it possible? Yes. Should we do that? My first thought was "maybe", but after thinking more about it, I would say "no", here is why: Starting point: 1 BTC on some output. Current situation: A single transaction moving 0.9000 BTC as

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions

2023-05-10 Thread Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev
Blocking Vasil was discussed on a similar GitHub PR. Whether or not one agrees or disagrees, the same process is being used. Anyone can NACK and give a reason for Russ as well. On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:55 AM Michael Folkson < michaelfolk...@protonmail.com> wrote: > Hi Steve > > > Isn't this as

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions

2023-05-10 Thread Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
Hi Steve > Isn't this as simple as anyone (in particular Core project contributors) can > express their view in this PR?https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27604 Nope. The extent to which the rationale for blocking Vasil as a maintainer applies or doesn't apply to ryanofsky (or future

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Package Relay Proposal

2023-05-10 Thread Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
Hi Tom, Yesterday a PR was opened to do just that, with caveats: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27609 For higher level tracking of the project: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27463 Cheers, Greg On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:39 AM Tom Trevethan via bitcoin-dev <

[bitcoin-dev] Interactive Payment Batching w/ Payjoin

2023-05-10 Thread Dan Gould via bitcoin-dev
Hi list, The following message details a number of examples using payjoin P2EP to coordinate payment batches. I stray from the original shape of stenographic payjoin, what I call "canonical payjoin" with 2 inputs and many outputs, to describe what I believe are novel structures that break

[bitcoin-dev] Package Relay Proposal

2023-05-10 Thread Tom Trevethan via bitcoin-dev
The submitpackage RPC is available on regtest in the current core release. Is there any plan or timeline for deploying this on mainnet in the next release? Can't find any recent discussion. It would be very helpful given current (and likely future) issues with mempool purge. Tom

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions

2023-05-10 Thread Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev
Isn't this as simple as anyone (in particular Core project contributors) can express their view in this PR? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27604 On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 5:03 AM Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 12:36 PM