Hi Symphonic,
> I'm a bit confused as to what exactly this is a proof of concept for.
This is a proof of concept for using nostr npub and relays for payjoin.
> Your use of SIGHASH_NONE does in fact make it possible for the reciever to do
> whatever they want with your funds (which I see you ack
> Regarding the potential payload extension attack, I believe that the
changes proposed in the [3] to allow tx replacement by smaller witness
would provide a viable solution?
The only plausible case I could see moving forward is replacing the
transaction to a form that has *no* annex or scriptpath
> Nevertheless, I next day I see other e-mails getting released to bitcoin-dev,
> while mine - was not.
If you created a new topic, then that is the reason. I noticed an interesting
thing: if the title of your post is just a reply to some existing topic, then
there are less strict rules, than i
Hi Joost,
> However, the primary advantage I see in the annex is that its data isn't
included in the calculation of the txid or a potential parent commit
transaction's txid (for inscriptions). I've explained this at [1]. This
> feature makes the annex a powerful tool for applications that would
id
