currently, there are providers of anonymity services, scaling services,
custody, and other services layered on top of bitcoin using trust-based and
federated models.
as bitcoin becomes more popular, these service providers have increasingly
had a louder "voice" in development and maintenance of th
Hi John,
I think lightning and other second time-sensitive layers being hit by
safety issues whenever the blocks are full is common knowledge as the issue
is being described in the paper under the "forced expiration spam" issues
arising spontaneously within an environment with high block space dem
Binaries for Bitcoin Core version v26.0rc2 are available from:
https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-26.0/test.rc2/
Source code can be found in git under the signed tag
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/v26.0rc2
This is a release candidate for a new major version release.
Prel
pá 3. 11. 2023 v 11:16 odesílatel Brad Morrison
napsal:
> Melvin/all,
>
> You make good points about high network fees being disruptive.
>
> What is more disruptive are spikes & valleys (instability) that last
> longer than the mempool cycle can handle.
>
> Right now, https://mempool.space/ indic
Melvin/all,
You make good points about high network fees being disruptive.
What is more disruptive are spikes & valleys (instability) that last
longer than the mempool cycle can handle.
Right now, https://mempool.space/ indicates that there are about 105,000
unconfirmed transactions and that
> The idea with package relay is that commitment transaction fees will
> be zero and that fees will always be paid via CPFP on the anchor
> output.
Yes, even if multiple commitment transactions are pre-signed with a RBF
range of more than zero, an attacker can always select the lowest fees
pre-sig
> To be clear, are you talking about anchor channels or non-anchor channels?
> Because in anchor channels, all outputs other than the anchor outputs
provided
> for fee bumping can't be spent until the commitment transaction is mined,
which
> means RBF/CPFP isn't relevant.
I think the distinction i
