Re: [bitcoin-dev] Lamport scheme (not signature) to economize on L1

2024-01-01 Thread David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
On 2024-01-01 00:17, yuri...@pm.me wrote: I'm afraid I didn't understand your objection. [...] I suspect my proposed scheme can be implemented with available, existing Bitcoin infrastructure. Is a soft fork or a hard fork required? If so, the proposal will need a lot of peer review and user a

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Lamport scheme (not signature) to economize on L1

2024-01-01 Thread Yuri S VB via bitcoin-dev
Hello, Dave, I'm afraid I didn't understand your objection. It would be great to have a direct, real-time conversation with you, if you have the availability. Be my guest to DM me for that. Though this is to be confirmed, I suspect my proposed scheme can be implemented with available, existing

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Lamport scheme (not signature) to economize on L1

2024-01-01 Thread Yuri S VB via bitcoin-dev
Dear all, Below goes reference to diagram of key derivation of current (hopefully final) version of my proposed protocol, which, now, doesn't rely on FFM cryptosystem. https://github.com/Yuri-SVB/LVBsig/blob/main/docs/keys_diagram.jpg Here, you have one-way function derivations happening from l