Re: [bitcoin-dev] RGB protocol announcement

2023-04-16 Thread Federico Tenga via bitcoin-dev
To add some context to the conversation, I would like to point out that another RGB lightning implementation exists based on LDK, you may want to check it out to have a better picture of how RGB works on LN: https://github.com/RGB-Tools/rgb-lightning-sample On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 at 07:35, David A. H

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Symbol for satoshi

2019-03-07 Thread Federico Tenga via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 11:13, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > If Satoshi wanted the currency units named after him, he would simply > have done it. I think this behaviour seems creepy and is harmful to > Bitcoin. > I don't believe the will of Satos

[bitcoin-dev] URI scheme with optional bech32 address

2018-07-24 Thread Federico Tenga via bitcoin-dev
Hello everyone, With my team we are working on a walleting application which ideally will generate a bech32 address when receiving from a bech32 compatible wallet, and a P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH address when receiving for a legacy wallet. However, it is of course impossible for the payee to know in a

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Idea: Marginal Pricing

2017-11-30 Thread Federico Tenga via bitcoin-dev
The main issue that I see with this proposal is that miners can still spam the network for free even with high sat/byte fee levels. They can first choose the sat/byte rate that maximize their profit, and then include a lot of spam transactions at that rate that will only pay fees to themselves, eff

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Standard address format for timelocked funds

2017-07-27 Thread Federico Tenga via bitcoin-dev
Hi ZmnSCPxj, Few thoughts about your proposal: 1- I kinda like the idea and I would probably use it, but still I believe it is a very limited use case and probably most wallet providers will not be interested in supporting it. 2- Early adopters and people highly involved in the community may appre

Re: [bitcoin-dev] how to disable segwit in my build?

2017-07-13 Thread Federico Tenga via bitcoin-dev
On 13 July 2017 at 03:04, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Can you explain why you wish to do this? It should have absolutely no > adverse impact on you-- if you don't use segwit, you don't use it-- it > may be the case that there is some confusi