t;>> So, fortunately, even if "tail supply attackers" will win, we will still
>>> have a chance to counter-attack by burning those coins, or (even better) by
>>> locking them in an endless circulation loop, just to satisfy their
>>> malicious soft-fork, w
> What about burning all fees and keep a block reward that will smooth out
while keeping the ~21M coins limit ?
This would be a hard fork afaict as it would go against the rules of the
coinbase transaction following the usual halving schedule.
However, if instead we added a rule that fees have
"Long time listener, first time caller". Just sharing my 2 sats:
While I find it stimulating, I think this discussion (and other similar
doom-like scenarios) is somewhat irrelevant in practice.
When the time comes and if we start seeing issues with block rewards being
too low to maintain
Good morning everyone,
Just wanted to point out a few things for discussion which may or may not
be obvious:
1) A simple scheme as described by ZmnSCPxj first can lead way for a
standardized process where people can excuse their legitimate attempts to
actually introduce vulnerabilities, where
