On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:37:48PM +, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 20th, 2021 at 3:20 PM, Owen Gunden via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > I also notice that, as of 22.0, Wladimir is no longer signing the
> > releases, and I have no trust in my gpg network of t
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 04:47:17PM +0200, Prayank wrote:
> > It seems confusing to have two sites that seemingly both represent
> > bitcoin core.
>
> There is only one website which represents Bitcoin Core full node
> implementation. You can download Bitcoin Core from
> https://bitcoincore.org
I a
When I search for "download bitcoin core" my top result is bitcoin.org,
which is out of date and doesn't have 22.0.
It seems confusing to have two sites that seemingly both represent
bitcoin core.
Maybe the download links could be removed from bitcoin.org and instead
it could just link to bi
I'm also a user who runs a full node, and I also like this idea. I think
Gavin has done some back-of-the-envelope calculations around this stuff,
but nothing so clearly defined as what you propose.
On 07/02/2015 08:33 AM, Mistr Bigs wrote:
I'm an end user running a full node on an aging laptop
On 06/26/2015 02:23 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Failure to plan now for a hard fork increase 6(?) months in the future
produces that lumpy, unpredictable market behavior.
The market has baked in the years-long behavior of low fees. From the
market PoV, inaction does lead to precisely that, a sudden
