Re: [bitcoin-dev] Boost Bitcoin circulation, Million Transactions Per Second with stronger privacy

I believe Zman meant issuer. raymo via bitcoin-dev escreveu no dia segunda, 28/06/2021 à(s) 18:45: > > Hi Greg, > You are right, the whole scenario is: > there is an issuer which own a UTXO > issuers get fiat money or goods or services from creditor in exchange of > a transaction. > the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Consensus (hard fork) PoST Datastore for Energy Efficient Mining

As said before, you are free to create the BIP in your own repository and bring it to discussion on the mailing list. then you can do a PR Lonero Foundation via bitcoin-dev escreveu no dia sábado, 6/03/2021 à(s) 08:58: > > I know Ethereum had an outlandishly large percentage of nodes running on

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Bitcoin Integrated Address Feature?

I believe you are looking for HD wallets. Nathan Worsley via bitcoin-dev escreveu no dia terça, 2/04/2019 à(s) 18:06: > > To whom it may concern, > > I believe a missing feature in Bitcoin is the ability to have an "integrated > address", where the address resolves into a Bitcoin address, and

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC

one year seems too long. i think with the BIP-148 experience you have we could easily get there in 6 months at most. Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev escreveu no dia segunda, 1/04/2019 à(s) 01:33: > > Certain parts of the community have been selling bitcoins for unreasonably > low prices. This has

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Dead Man's Switch

You can do it on 2nd layer solutions such as the lightning network, with their own format. On the base layer you cannot do it without a hard fork, or it would undermine the invariants of bitcoin. 2017-12-12 8:24 GMT+00:00 Teweldemedhin Aberra : > How? > > > > From: Ricardo

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Visually Differentiable - Bitcoin Addresses

start double checking the last few bytes instead? 2017-10-30 8:56 GMT+00:00 shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev : > Hi, > > When I copy and paste bitcoin address, I double check the first few bytes, > to make sure I copied the correct one. This is to make sure

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A roadmap to a better header format and bigger block size

I believe i've seen Luke say this several times before, but there are several more things that the majority of the devs agree should be in bitcoin. I would suggest to compile that list for your stage 3, so that you can have an hardfork that fixes most of those things, and there should be some

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Forget dormant UTXOs without confiscating bitcoin

I really like ideas that tackle this issue. The question imho is what is the incentive to run a "Full UTXO node" instead of a pruned or archive node. For starters, it would be nice to know what would be the savings for Full UTXO nodes over archive nodes right now. Also, what advantages would this