..What you have proposed is interesting but seems to do nothing for the
issue of transaction
bandwidth, which seems to be approaching its threshold:
..
This system just shows one way of changing the way a miner calculates txn
priority.
A miners should always do what makes him the most money, so a
Hi Damian,
Thought I'd chip in. This is a hard fork scenario. This system has flaws,
they all do.
If you had a fixed fee per block, so that every txn in that block paid the
same fee, that might make it easier to include all txns eventually, as you
envisage.
The fee could be calculated as the av
Totally agree something like this required..
I've been burned.
But I like the 'old' idea of putting the hash of a block that MUST be on
the chain that this txn can eventually be added to. If the hash is not a
valid block on the chain, the txn can't be added.
It means you can choose exactly which
