Hi, > Does this functionality change peer selection?
This bit will be used for selecting outgoing peers in Bitcoin XT. On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:06 PM, G. Andrew Stone via bitcoin-dev > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > The Bitcoin Unlimited client needs a services bit to indicate that the > node > > is capable of communicating thin blocks. We propose to use bit 4 as > AFAIK > > bit 3 is already earmarked for Segregated Witness. > > Does this functionality change peer selection? If not, the preferred > signaling mechanism is probably the one in BIP 130. > > Otherwise, I think the standard method for getting numbers has been to > write a BIP documenting the usage. I don't know if that is intentional > or just how things have previously happened; and I don't have much of > an opinion on it. > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
