Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: Low Energy Bitcoin PoW

2021-05-18 Thread mike--- via bitcoin-dev
Nothing in a dynamic system like PoW mining can be 100% anticipated, for example there might be advanced in manufacturing of chips which are patented and so on. It sounds like your take is that this means no improvements can ever be made by any mechanism, however conservative. We do go into

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: Low Energy Bitcoin PoW

2021-05-18 Thread mike--- via bitcoin-dev
That’s interesting. I didn’t know the history of ASICBOOST. Our proposal (see Implementation) is to phase in oPoW slowly starting at a very low % of the rewards (say 1%). That should give a long testing period where there is real financial incentive for things like ASICBOOST Does that resolve

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: Low Energy Bitcoin PoW

2021-05-18 Thread mike--- via bitcoin-dev
That’s a fair point about patents. However, note that we were careful about this. oPoW only uses SHA3 (can be replaced with SHA256 in principle as well) and low precision linear matrix multiplication. A whole industry is trying to accelerate 8-bit linear matrix mults for AI so there is already

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: Low Energy Bitcoin PoW

2021-05-18 Thread mike--- via bitcoin-dev
Devrandom is correct to point out that there is nuance to these things and it’s better to look at the details rather than proclaiming that PoW is PoW. (I do agree though w the original point that other ideas often turn out to reduce to PoW despite their convoluted architecture) A note on the