> That's not an argument not to do it though if you take a longer term
> perspective on building the strongest possible foundation for Lightning or
> other Layer 2 projects. The security benefit would just be delayed until a
> significant majority of Bitcoin Core users upgraded to a version
> This is the assumption which I don't agree with and hence asked some
> questions in my email. A new RBF policy used by default in Core will not
> improve the security of projects that are vulnerable to multiple RBF policies
> or rely on these policies in a way that affects their security.
> I suspect as with defaults generally most users will run whatever the
> defaults are as they won't care to change them (or even be capable of
> changing them if they are very non-technical).
30% nodes are using 0.21.1 right now whereas latest version was 22.0 and some
are even running
Hi Prayank
> 1.Is Lightning Network and a few other layer 2 projects vulnerable to
> multiple RBF policies being used?
Clearly the security of the Lightning Network and some other Layer 2 projects
are at least impacted or partly dependent on policy rules in a way that the
base
