Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Waiting SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT and Packing Packages

2021-06-24 Thread Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
Hi Michael, > Browsing quickly through Greg's piece, a lot of the reasoning is based on FOSS experience from Linux/Juniper, which to the best of my knowledge are centralized software projects ? > That is Greg's point. If Linux doesn't look further than the current > version and the next version

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Waiting SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT and Packing Packages

2021-06-21 Thread Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
I don't want to divert from the topic of this thread ("Waiting SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT and Packing Packages"), we can set up a separate thread if we want to discuss this further. But just a couple of things. > Browsing quickly through Greg's piece, a lot of the reasoning is based on > FOSS experience

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Waiting SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT and Packing Packages

2021-06-21 Thread Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
Hi Dave, > That might work for current LN-penalty, but I'm not sure it works for eltoo. Well, we have not settled yet on the eltoo design but if we take the later proposal in date [0], signing the update transaction with SIGHGASH_ANYPREVOUT lets you attach non-interactively a single-party

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Waiting SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT and Packing Packages

2021-06-19 Thread David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 06:11:38PM -0400, Antoine Riard wrote: > 2) Solving the Pre-Signed Feerate problem : Package-Relay or > SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT > > For Lightning, either package-relay or SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT should be able to > solve the pre-signed feerate issue [3] > > [...] > > [3] I don't