I have opened a BIP PR at https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/910
and also created a Python library with test vectors referenced in the BIP text.
I am still unsure if I should or shouldnt split the BIP's "Applications" into a
separate BIP or leave in the current BIP.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐
Yes, I plan to submit as a BIP. I was just letting it sit for a while for
others to consider.
I was also considering to split the BIP into two. One for the the entropy
derivation, and the Applications section would be another BIP. This would be
akin to how BIP32 is the basis for derivation sche
Although I believe that there needs to be a review by a cryptographic
engineering expert (ideally Pieter Wuille, who may have to hold his nose to
give it a pragmatic review) and I believe such a review will likely some
suggest some improvements, I do think something in this area should be done.
Fo
I looked at it and consider the crypto choices reasonable and reusing
existing bitcoin dependencies in library crypto building blocks
mostly.
For myself i think the use-case of having an offline seed manager that
can be backed up once, and support multiple wallets, including ones
created after the
Hello,
We are planning on implementing the [Deterministic Entropy From BIP32
Keychains](https://gist.github.com/ethankosakovsky/268c52f018b94bea29a6e809381c05d6)
BIP on Coldcard.
Is there a BIP number planned to be assigned and is there any review of this
BIP yet?
Regards,
ℝ.
Rodolfo Novak
