Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [bitcoin-dev] Sidechain headers on mainchain (unification
> of drivechains and spv proofs)
> Local Time: September 9, 2017 3:33 PM
> UTC Time: September 9, 2017 3:33 PM
> From: tr
Good morning Paul,
Thank you for your consideration.
>> 1. Unifies merge mining (h* commitment) and WT^ validity voting.
>> Merge-mined headers increase the vote on a WT^, by increasing the depth
>> of the WT^.
>
>1. I think it is a mistake for SHOM ("Sidechain Headers on Mainchain")
>to "unify m
Hi everyone,
I have some agreements and disagreements.
I agree with Zmn:
1. That the sidechain's header is fully defined by the bits of data
included in mainchain headers. These bits include "h*" (some hash that
is either of the header itself or side:hashMerkleRoot), something that
forces these
