> The constants table would be part of the SCRIPT puzzle
Ah I see what you're saying now. You're not talking about referencing
inputs from the spender, but rather constants for the script writer to
parameterize a jet with. TBH I think both would be useful, and both could
potentially be done in th
Good morning Billy,
> > I think we would want to have a cleanstack rule at some point
>
> Ah is this a rule where a script shouldn't validate if more than just a true
> is left on the stack? I can see how that would prevent the non-soft-fork
> version of what I'm proposing.
Yes.
There was also
> I think we would want to have a cleanstack rule at some point
Ah is this a rule where a script shouldn't validate if more than just a
true is left on the stack? I can see how that would prevent the
non-soft-fork version of what I'm proposing.
> How large is the critical mass needed?
Well it se
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
> Just ask a bunch of fullnodes to add this 1Mb of extra ignored data in
this tiny 1-input-1-output transaction so I pay only a small fee
I'm not suggesting that you wouldn't have to pay a fee for it. You'd pay a
fee for it as normal, so there's no DOS vector. Doesn't adding
extra w
Good morning Billy,
> Hi ZmnSCPxj,
>
> > Just ask a bunch of fullnodes to add this 1Mb of extra ignored data in
> >this tiny 1-input-1-output transaction so I pay only a small fee
>
> I'm not suggesting that you wouldn't have to pay a fee for it. You'd pay a
> fee for it as normal, so there's n
Good morning Billy,
Changed subject since this is only tangentially related to `OP_FOLD`.
> Let me organize my thoughts on this a little more clearly. There's a couple
> possibilities I can think of for a jet-like system:
>
> A. We could implement jets now without a consensus change, and without
