Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-29 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:08:21PM -0500, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote: > While I support essentially any proposed taproot activation method, including > a > flag day activation, I think it is premature to call BIP8 dead. > > Even today, I still think that starting with BIP8 LOT=false i

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-06 Thread Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
Replies inline. Several sections removed, where I basically agree. On 3/4/21 08:47, Russell O'Connor wrote: Appologies as I've rearranged your comments in my reply. I agree with you.  I also think we have plenty of evidence to proceed with taproot and could proceed with a PR for such a flag day

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-05 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
On Friday 05 March 2021 14:51:12 Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:32 PM Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev > > wrote: > > So that leads me to believe here that the folks who oppose LOT=true > > primarily have an issue with forced signaling, which personally I > > don't c

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-05 Thread Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:32 PM Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev wrote: > So that leads me to believe here that the folks who oppose LOT=true > primarily have an issue with forced signaling, which personally I > don't care about as much, not the idea of committing to a UASF from > the get go. The

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-04 Thread Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
Mike was wrong about a number of things, and in the end decided that Bitcoin was pointless, as people could not defend it against the state. He used this as the basis for his defense of large blocks and centralized mining. When that didn’t work out he quit, to work on centralized systems. Peopl

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-04 Thread Vincent Truong via bitcoin-dev
I must remind everyone of Mike Hearn's proposal not many years ago, which ought to be on everyone's mind right now. "Every soft fork should be a hard fork, and that soft forks are inherently dangerous because old nodes are tricked to not know what the new nodes are doing" (paraphrased). Whether tap

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-04 Thread Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev
As one of the folks that prefers LOT=true I can certainly attest to the fact that at least some of us would be willing to do a flag day activation instead. As far as I'm concerned, flag day does not give a very small percentage of the user base (5-10% of minerz) the ability to veto a change that ha

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-04 Thread Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
Appologies as I've rearranged your comments in my reply. On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:14 PM Matt Corallo wrote: > > On 3/3/21 14:08, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > After a normal and successful Core update with LOT=false, we will have > more data showing broad community support for the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-03 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton via bitcoin-dev
would it help by first setting a regular period of e.g. 6 months when only at that time would consensus rules ever be changed? not, "6 months from now taproot will be introduced', a rule, "*any* consensus change regardless of what they are (including NO change) will *ONLY* be made at regular inter

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-03 Thread Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
On 3/3/21 14:08, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote: While I support essentially any proposed taproot activation method, including a flag day activation, I think it is premature to call BIP8 dead. Even today, I still think that starting with BIP8 LOT=false is, generally speaking, consider

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-03 Thread yanmaani--- via bitcoin-dev
On 2021-03-03 20:48, Chris Belcher wrote: On 03/03/2021 17:30, yanma...@cock.li wrote: Is that supposed to be a good thing? "We should do X because it'll work" doesn't prove X is actually good. These things can be evil, but they can also be legitimate opposition to a change. Taking away the po

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-03 Thread Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
While I support essentially any proposed taproot activation method, including a flag day activation, I think it is premature to call BIP8 dead. Even today, I still think that starting with BIP8 LOT=false is, generally speaking, considered a reasonably safe activation method in the sense that I thi

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-03 Thread Chris Belcher via bitcoin-dev
It is good that social media drama can only make its own followers fork away. In bitcoin people represent themselves, if they want certain rules enforced they should have to actually tell their software to do that. The problem with BIP8 is that social media drama has a incentive to promote brinksma

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-03 Thread yanmaani--- via bitcoin-dev
On 2021-03-03 14:39, Chris Belcher via bitcoin-dev wrote: Enter flag day activation. With a flag day there can be no brinksmanship. A social media blitz cant do anything except have its own followers fork away. Crucially, miner signalling cant be used to change the activation date for nodes tha

[bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot

2021-03-03 Thread Chris Belcher via bitcoin-dev
The bitcoin world is close to total gridlock on the question of how to activate taproot. There's no agreement on activation[1][2], and if an agreement isn't reached then nothing happens. That would be really terrible because we'd miss out on the benefits of taproot and potentially other future soft