Re: [bitcoin-dev] Provisions (was: PSA: Taproot loss of quantum protections)

2021-03-16 Thread Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 03:10:21PM +0100, Andrea via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Hi! Sorry for the OT, could you provide some references to ring signatures > over/for/via taproot (I mean the schema or something like that)? And what is > "Provisions" (the capital letter makes me think it's a product/tec

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Provisions (was: PSA: Taproot loss of quantum protections)

2021-03-16 Thread ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
Good morning Andrew and Andrea, Further afield: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Taproot_Uses Taproot ring signatures was also asked by Andrea, above page contains this link (have not actually read it myself): https://github.com/jonasnick/taproot-ringsig Regards, ZmnSCPxj

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Provisions (was: PSA: Taproot loss of quantum protections)

2021-03-17 Thread Andrea via bitcoin-dev
Thanks for your time Andrew and ZmnSCPxj, Jonas contrib was also referenced in twitter post provided by Andrew, but the repetion is an effective underlining of its importance :) I'm busy-at-work for a couple of days, but I'm planning my weekend spare time to deal with infos from both of you..

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Provisions (was: PSA: Taproot loss of quantum protections)

2021-03-20 Thread Andrea Barontini via bitcoin-dev
Hi again Andrew and ZmnSCPxj, I have dealt with the resources you provided me Regarding Provisions I have concentrated my attention to Proof of assets and I have to say it has been a good "exercise" for my ZKP learning Regarding Jonas Nick code I'm not sure I would call it "a use of Taproot"