Hi woltx,
Thanks for the response.
> Using all inputs, it becomes possible to use SP addresses in coinjoins as
> long as all participants agree.
> More information:
> https://gist.github.com/RubenSomsen/c43b79517e7cb701ebf77eec6dbb46b8#variant-using-all-inputs
Using new addresses and SP address
Hi /dev/fd0
I haven't accessed ML for a while.
1) All inputs being used sounds good although I do not understand how it would
benefit coinjoin.
Using all inputs, it becomes possible to use SP addresses in coinjoins as long
as all participants agree.
More information:
https://gist.github.com/Ru
Hi woltx,
Thanks for working on silent payments improving it in each version.
1) All inputs being used sounds good although I do not understand how it would
benefit coinjoin.
2) New RPC command name is better.
> I opened a new PR (#1143) to add a function to convert from x-only to
> compressed
Silent Payment v4 (coinjoin support added)
Changes:
. Silent payments now use all inputs to create transactions. Previously, they
only used the first input. This change increases privacy and makes silent
payments compatible with coinjoin.
. `getspaddress` RPC renamed to `getsilentaddress` for
